AI peer review
AI peer review that's actually calibrated
8 specialised AI agents review your manuscript against standards derived from 23,000 real peer reviews across 15+ academic platforms. Full structured report in under 15 minutes.
What 'AI peer review' actually means here
Most 'AI peer review' tools wrap a single LLM prompt. Ours decomposes the review into eight specialist agents — Methodology, Formulas & Equations, Originality, Literature Coverage, Reproducibility, Clarity & Language, Figures & Tables, Prior Publication — each with its own prompt calibrated against published rubrics (CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA, field-specific style guides).
Each agent's prompt is seeded at inference time with 8–40 real peer reviews from our training corpus via FTS5 retrieval. That's the calibration step most tools skip: the model doesn't just know 'what a review looks like' in the abstract; it's shown concrete, field-matched examples of good reviews every time it runs.
How the review runs
Submit a PDF or paste a DOI / arXiv ID. The engine fans out in parallel:
- A 12-second prior-publication check across CrossRef, Unpaywall, arXiv, medRxiv, bioRxiv, and a 900,000-paper institutional library.
- The 8 specialist agents run sequentially against our trained rubric.
- A synthesis step integrates the specialist reports into a single structured review with an overall score.
- Output is delivered as a readable report and a machine-readable JSON object (for integration into CI or writing tools).
When to use it
The tool is most useful in three situations:
- Pre-submission triage — 15 minutes before you send a draft to a closed journal or conference.
- Revision planning — after you get a R&R from a journal, re-run to see what the 'second reviewer' would flag.
- Self-training — PhD students and early-career researchers use it to internalise what referees look for in their field.
Pricing
We charge per submission, not per seat. The free tier gives you pre-submission scoring (Tier 1-5) + abbreviated reports — enough for the 'should I keep polishing or submit now?' call. Paid submissions unlock the full 8-agent report with per-section feedback, prior-publication evidence, and the JSON export.
The working scholar tier is explicitly cheaper than a conference registration; the free tier is permanent and doesn't require a card.