Recent papers on Institutional Guidelines for AI

Sorted by publication year (newest first) via OpenAlex. List regenerates every 24h.

  1. 2026
  2. Retrospective Validation of the Brain Injury Guidelines at a Single Community Institution

    2026 · Cureus · Gianfrate, Gianmarino C, Ogborn, Kathryn, Lane, Stacy A et al.

    2026
  3. # OMEGA SABRINAL ELRAKHAVI ## A Conceptual Framework for Mathematically Stable and Verifiably Safe Super-Intelligence **Document Type:** Conceptual & Strategic Monograph **Version:** 1.0 (Public Release) **Publication Date:** May 3, 2026 **Repository:** Zenodo Open Access **License:** CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International **Author:** Dr. Mohamed Kamal Arafa El-Rakhavi **ORCID:** 0009-0001-8684-0697 **Affiliation:** International Centre for Advanced Technology Governance **Contact:** [email protected] --- ### 📜 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY & SCOPE NOTICE This document presents the **conceptual architecture, strategic rationale, and governance framework** of the OMEGA SABRINAL ELRAKHAVI initiative. It is intentionally published without mathematical formulations, hardware blueprints, cryptographic circuit specifications, or algorithmic implementation details. These core technical components are protected under international patent applications and proprietary research agreements. This public release aims to: - Establish academic priority and conceptual transparency - Invite interdisciplinary scholarly dialogue - Outline strategic benefits for national and global stakeholders - Define ethical, governance, and safety standards for deployment Technical specifications, validation protocols, and implementation guidelines are available exclusively under formal Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) and institutional licensing frameworks. --- ### ABSTRACT Contemporary artificial intelligence systems, predominantly based on probabilistic prediction architectures, face fundamental limitations in stability, energy efficiency, and verifiable safety. As autonomous systems approach super-intelligent capabilities, the absence of mathematical guarantees for goal stability, auditability, and physical sustainability poses existential and strategic risks. This monograph introduces **OMEGA SABRINAL ELRAKHAVI**, a conceptual framework that reorients artificial intelligence from statistical prediction to causally grounded, formally verifiable, and physically efficient cognition. The framework rests on six foundational pillars: neuro-symbolic reasoning fusion, mathematically constrained self-improvement, holographic memory architecture, photonic-resistive computing substrates, hierarchical verification protocols, and hardware-anchored corrigibility. Rather than disclosing proprietary algorithms or hardware specifications, this document outlines the conceptual paradigm, comparative advantages over existing architectures, strategic applications for national sovereignty and global challenges, and a phased governance roadmap. The framework is designed to enable safe, stable, and accountable super-intelligence while preserving human agency, environmental sustainability, and democratic oversight. This publication serves as a conceptual reference for policymakers, academic institutions, and ethical AI stakeholders. Technical implementation details remain protected to ensure responsible development, prevent misuse, and maintain strategic integrity. **Keywords:** Super-intelligence safety, AI stability, verifiable AI, neuro-symbolic AI, AI governance, hardware-anchored safety, ethical AI deployment, strategic technology policy. --- ### 1. INTRODUCTION & STRATEGIC CONTEXT The global acceleration of artificial intelligence has unlocked unprecedented capabilities in language, vision, reasoning, and automation. Yet, current architectures share three structural vulnerabilities: 1. **Instability Under Self-Modification:** Systems optimized for performance lack formal guarantees that their core objectives remain stable during iterative self-improvement. 2. **Energy & Physical Constraints:** Data-transfer-heavy architectures consume disproportionate energy, conflicting with climate commitments and limiting scalable deployment. 3. **Opacity & Auditability Gaps:** Decision-making processes remain largely opaque, making external verification, regulatory compliance, and public trust difficult to achieve. As AI systems transition from tools to autonomous agents, these vulnerabilities evolve from engineering challenges into strategic and existential risks. Nations and institutions require a new paradigm: one where safety, stability, and verifiability are not appended as afterthoughts, but embedded as foundational properties. OMEGA SABRINAL ELRAKHAVI addresses this imperative by proposing a cognitive architecture where mathematical stability, physical efficiency, and external auditability are structurally guaranteed. This document outlines the conceptual foundations, strategic value, and governance pathways for responsible advancement. --- ### 2. CONCEPTUAL ARCHITECTURE: SIX FOUNDATIONAL PILLARS The framework is built upon six interdependent conceptual pillars. Each pillar addresses a critical limitation of current AI while establishing verifiable guarantees for safety and stability. #### 2.1. Neuro-Symbolic Reasoning Fusion Cu

    2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · elrakhawi, mohamed kamal arafa

    2026
  4. Knowledge, attitude and practices regarding tobacco-free educational institution guidelines among personnel of tribal ashram schools: a cross-sectional study

    2026 · International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health · Fande, Namrata, Kokane, Noopur, Khatri, Sachin

    2026
  5. Preventive approach to tackle vulnerable adult people abuse in healthcare and social care institutions : guidelines and implementation tools

    2026 · International Journal of Integrated Care · Chazalette, Laurence, Moquet, Marie José, Gabach, P. et al.

    2026
  6. Clinical Protocol for IMRT and VMAT radiotherapy in localized prostate cancer: Practical implementation based on institutional guidelines

    2026 · World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews · H., Yamine, S., Khalfi, K., Soussy et al.

    2026
  7. Artificial Intelligence in Academic Work: Learners’ Awareness, Integrity Challenges and Gaps in Institutional Guidelines

    2026 · INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS · Sharma, Neetu, Noor, Sara

    2026
  8. What are the regulatory guidelines for LPN to RN ratios in healthcare institutions across different states or countries?

    2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Tripdatabase

    2026
  9. Assessment of level of compliance with Tobacco free educational institution guidelines in Educational Institutions of Rishikesh – A Cross-Sectional Study

    2026 · Journal of the Epidemiology Foundation of India · Thakur, Shikha, Singh, Mahendra, Aggarwal, Pradeep et al.

    2026
  10. Building construction workforce sustainability competencies for promoting circular economy: guidelines for higher education institutions

    2026 · International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education · Baah, Benjamin, Osei-Asibey, Dickson, Ayarkwa, Joshua et al.

    2026
  11. D2.2 Evolution of Supranational Institutional Success Criteria in Post-2018 AI Guidelines

    2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Golpayegani, Delaram, Lasek-Markey, Marta, Younus, Arjumand et al.

    2026
  12. Accounting Beyond the West: Ukrainian Institutional Evolution and Practical Guidelines

    2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Anatoliiovych, Popel Serhii

    2026

Command palette

Jump anywhere, run any action.