biology2 papersavg year 2026quality 5/5

critical integrity academic thinking students

Research gap analysis derived from 2 biology papers in our local library.

The gap

Future research can examine the influence of AI on students' critical thinking skills, academic creativity, and scientific integrity by using a more diverse methodological approach.; The findings indicated lack of guidance from most institutions on GenAI usage, which was detrimental to students' academic integrity and critical thinking skills.

Research trend

Emerging — attention growing, methods still coalescing.

Supporting evidence — 2 representative gaps

  • Students' Experiences of Learning Authenticity in Artificial Intelligence Assisted Academic Work (2026) · doi

    Future research can examine the influence of AI on students' critical thinking skills, academic creativity, and scientific integrity by using a more diverse methodological approach.

    Keywords: future examine influence students critical thinking skills academic creativity scientific integrity using diverse methodological approach
  • Adoption of Generative Artificial Intelligence in L2 Graduate Academic Writing in Higher Education: A Scoping Review of Current Status and Implications (2026) · doi

    The findings indicated lack of guidance from most institutions on GenAI usage, which was detrimental to students' academic integrity and critical thinking skills.

    Keywords: lack guidance institutions genai usage detrimental students academic integrity critical thinking skills

Working on this gap? Publish with us.

Science AI Journal reviews manuscripts in under 15 minutes with 8 specialised AI reviewers calibrated on 23,000+ real peer reviews. Open access, CC BY 4.0.

Related gaps in biology

Command palette

Jump anywhere, run any action.