Science AI Journal
Try Pre-Check Free
biology2 papersavg year 2026quality 4/5

false risk statistical errors associations

Research gap analysis derived from 2 biology papers in our local library.

The gap

The large number of statistical comparisons further increases the risk of type I errors, and some associations may therefore reflect false-positive findings.; Risk of 'false personalization' needs to be addressed in future implementations.

Research trend

Emerging — attention growing, methods still coalescing.

Supporting evidence — 2 representative gaps

  • IL-1 cluster gene polymorphisms in Turkish patients with gout and their association with ınflammatory markers: a cross-sectional genetic study (2025) · doi

    The large number of statistical comparisons further increases the risk of type I errors, and some associations may therefore reflect false-positive findings.

    Keywords: large number statistical comparisons further increases risk type errors associations reflect false positive
  • The Influence of Artificial Intelligence on Vietnam’s Higher Education in the Contemporary Era (2026) · doi

    Risk of 'false personalization' needs to be addressed in future implementations.

    Keywords: risk false personalization needs addressed future implementations

Working on this gap? Publish with us.

Science AI Journal reviews manuscripts in under 15 minutes with 8 specialised AI reviewers calibrated on 23,000+ real peer reviews. Open access, CC BY 4.0.

Submit a manuscriptRun a pre-submission check

Related gaps in biology

Command palette

Jump anywhere, run any action.