general2 papersavg year 2026quality 3/5
introduce nature collection treatment follow
Research gap analysis derived from 2 general papers in our local library.
The gap
The study was retrospective in nature, which may introduce bias in treatment efficacy monitoring and follow-up outcomes.; The study was retrospective in nature, which may introduce bias in data collection and analysis.
Research trend
Emerging — attention growing, methods still coalescing.
Supporting evidence — 2 representative gaps
- ORGAN-SAVING APPROACHES IN THE SURGICAL CORRECTION OF AESTHETIC DEFORMATIONS OF THE NOSE (2026) · doi
The study was retrospective in nature, which may introduce bias in data collection and analysis.
Keywords: retrospective nature introduce bias collection - RESULTS OF TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH STAGE II UTERINE SARCOMA (2026) · doi
The study was retrospective in nature, which may introduce bias in treatment efficacy monitoring and follow-up outcomes.
Keywords: retrospective nature introduce bias treatment efficacy monitoring follow outcomes
Working on this gap? Publish with us.
Science AI Journal reviews manuscripts in under 15 minutes with 8 specialised AI reviewers calibrated on 23,000+ real peer reviews. Open access, CC BY 4.0.
Related gaps in general
- students education measuring artificial intelligenceThe paper discusses algorithmic determinism risks in education systems integrating AI but does not specify which pedagogical domains (mathem…
- cancer patients metachronous breast primaryThe study was limited to 90 patients with locally advanced colon cancer at a single center; larger multicenter studies are needed to validat…
- dynamic monitoring assessment thermal continuousThe paper focuses on theoretical and normative approaches to heat loss calculation but does not explore integration with dynamic thermal sim…
- recurrence follow rates survival insteadThe paper does not discuss long-term follow-up data or survival outcomes, focusing instead on pathomorphosis grades without addressing recur…