biology2 papersavg year 2025quality 5/5

ngal published kidney scant humans

Research gap analysis derived from 2 biology papers in our local library.

The gap

Most published studies on NGAL were based on data of experiments with animals and adult humans, with scant information for use of NGAL determination in children only with asthma, sepsis and kidney diseases.; Scant information exists for use of NGAL determination in children only with asthma, sepsis and kidney diseases, with limited pediatric applications documented.; Most published studies on NGAL were based on data from experiments with animals and adult humans, with insufficient...

Research trend

Emerging — attention growing, methods still coalescing.

Supporting evidence — 3 representative gaps

  • EFFECTS OF THERMAL STRESS ON CARDIOVASCULAR FUNCTION DURING RESTING AND EXERCISING (2025) · doi

    Most published studies on NGAL were based on data of experiments with animals and adult humans, with scant information for use of NGAL determination in children only with asthma, sepsis and kidney diseases.

    Keywords: ngal published based experiments animals adult humans scant information determination children asthma sepsis kidney diseases
  • Early pregnancy pre-eclampsia screening using Fetal Medicine Foundation formula: a longitudinal study (2025) · doi

    Scant information exists for use of NGAL determination in children only with asthma, sepsis and kidney diseases, with limited pediatric applications documented.

    Keywords: scant information exists ngal determination children asthma sepsis kidney diseases limited pediatric applications documented
  • Early pregnancy pre-eclampsia screening using Fetal Medicine Foundation formula: a longitudinal study (2025) · doi

    Most published studies on NGAL were based on data from experiments with animals and adult humans, with insufficient pediatric-specific research.

    Keywords: published ngal based experiments animals adult humans insufficient pediatric specific

Working on this gap? Publish with us.

Science AI Journal reviews manuscripts in under 15 minutes with 8 specialised AI reviewers calibrated on 23,000+ real peer reviews. Open access, CC BY 4.0.

Related gaps in biology

Command palette

Jump anywhere, run any action.