Science AI Journal
Try Pre-Check Free
general2 papersavg year 2026quality 4/5

older younger patient represent years

Research gap analysis derived from 2 general papers in our local library.

The gap

Age range was limited to 18-52 years, which may not represent outcomes in older or younger patient populations.; The study's findings need to be verified in a dynamic context through analysis of other age groups, both younger and older than grades 3-4.

Research trend

Emerging — attention growing, methods still coalescing.

Supporting evidence — 2 representative gaps

  • ORGAN-SAVING APPROACHES IN THE SURGICAL CORRECTION OF AESTHETIC DEFORMATIONS OF THE NOSE (2026) · doi

    Age range was limited to 18-52 years, which may not represent outcomes in older or younger patient populations.

    Keywords: range limited years represent outcomes older younger patient populations
  • Specificity of subjective position and learning motivation among primary school students (2026) · doi

    The study's findings need to be verified in a dynamic context through analysis of other age groups, both younger and older than grades 3-4.

    Keywords: need verified dynamic context groups younger older grades

Working on this gap? Publish with us.

Science AI Journal reviews manuscripts in under 15 minutes with 8 specialised AI reviewers calibrated on 23,000+ real peer reviews. Open access, CC BY 4.0.

Submit a manuscriptRun a pre-submission check

Related gaps in general

Command palette

Jump anywhere, run any action.