Between these two poles, a new phenomenon has remained underexplored: what happens when an AI is not used in an isolated or sporadic way, but is instead integrated continuously into a healthy, stable,
Research gap analysis derived from 3 psychology papers in our local library.
The gap
Between these two poles, a new phenomenon has remained underexplored: what happens when an AI is not used in an isolated or sporadic way, but is instead integrated continuously into a healthy, stable, and meaningful human environment.
Consensus across the literature
Clustered from 3 gap mentions across 3 papers via embedding cosine ≥ 0.62.
Research trend
Established — well-defined area with open sub-problems.
Supporting evidence — 3 representative gaps
- AI, Cognition, and the Biosociotechnological Mesh: An Introductory Ontological and Strategic Framework for Understanding Postbiotic Cognition Systems, Their Impacts, and Systemic Risks (2026) · doi
Third, it remains unclear what replacement capacities AI-dependence creates in return. Whether AI-mediated cognition follows this pattern, or whether its coupling to biological reward systems and its speed of deployment introduce qualitatively different risks, remains an open empirical question. This leads to several predictable effects: • Ambiguity becomes aversive: the mind grows less tolerant of open questions, partial understanding, or slow-progress problem spaces.
Keywords: remains whether open third unclear replacement capacities dependence creates return mediated cognition follows pattern coupling - Relational Cognitive Consciousness in Human–AI Interaction (2026) · doi
Between these two poles, a new phenomenon has remained underexplored: what happens when an AI is not used in an isolated or sporadic way, but is instead integrated continuously into a healthy, stable, and meaningful human environment.
Keywords: poles phenomenon remained underexplored happens used isolated sporadic instead integrated continuously healthy stable meaningful human - Ironies of artificial intelligence (2023) · doi
Five ironies of AI are presented including difficulties with understanding AI and forming adaptations, opaqueness in AI limitations and biases that can drive human decision biases, and difficulties in understanding the AI reliability, despite the fact that AI remains insufficiently intelligent for many of its intended applications.
Keywords: difficulties understanding biases five ironies presented including forming adaptations opaqueness limitations drive human decision reliability
Explore this gap further
Search “Between these two poles, a new phenomenon has remained underexplored: what happens when an AI is not used in an isolated or sporadic way, but is instead integrated continuously into a healthy, stable,” across open scholarly engines for the latest related literature.
Working on this gap? Publish with us.
Science AI Journal reviews manuscripts in under 15 minutes with 8 specialised AI reviewers calibrated on 23,000+ real peer reviews. Open access, CC BY 4.0.
Free tools for your next paper
Related gaps in Psychology
- Abstract Parental warmth and child emotion regulation have each been implicated in the development of child pro‐social behaviours; however, their interactive benefits remain unclear.Abstract Parental warmth and child emotion regulation have each been implicated in the development of child pro‐social behaviours; however, …
- However, few studies have confirmed the influence of family functioning on poststroke depression or explored the association among daily activities, family functioning, and poststroke depression.However, few studies have confirmed the influence of family functioning on poststroke depression or explored the association among daily act…
- Mindfulness‐based stress‐reduction therapies have emerged as a potential intervention and have shown promising results, though studies of efficacy in adolescent populations are lacking.Mindfulness‐based stress‐reduction therapies have emerged as a potential intervention and have shown promising results, though studies of ef…
- However, few studies have examined contextual factors that may impact how peer victimization contributes to these symptoms in middle childhood, especially in the form of victimization.However, few studies have examined contextual factors that may impact how peer victimization contributes to these symptoms in middle childho…