Discussion Representative analysis of the AI-generated consent drafts revealed several recurring omissions across procedures. In the Ethics domain, explicit statements regarding the patient’s right to

The gap

Consensus across the literature

Supporting evidence — 3 representative gaps

• Comparison of direct anterior and posterior approaches in total hip arthroplasty within a mature surgical practice: A single surgeon analysis of complications and perioperative metrics (2026) · doi

  In the long-term, prospective studies are warranted to determine which surgical approach yields superior outcomes across these key metrics. Authors’ contributions: SWF: Conceptualized, performed formal analysis, conducted research, and wrote the final and initial draft; CJD: Conceptualized, conducted research, provided resources, oversight, and wrote the final and initial draft. All authors have critically reviewed and approved the final draft and are responsible for the manuscript’s content and similarity index. Ethical approval: The research/study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the University of Rochester Department of Human Subjects Protection, number STUDY00010189, dated February 26, 2025. Declaration of patient consent: The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient has given consent for clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patient understands that the patient’s names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

  Keywords: patient authors final draft consent conceptualized conducted wrote initial approved long term prospective warranted determine
• Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence Language Model for Generating Informed Consent Forms in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: A QUEST Framework Analysis (2026) · doi

  Discussion Representative analysis of the AI-generated consent drafts revealed several recurring omissions across procedures. In the Ethics domain, explicit statements regarding the patient’s right to refuse or withdraw consent were consis- tently absent. In the Safety domain, procedure-specific high-risk complications were frequently omitted, such as nerve injury in third molar extraction, sinus perforation and implant failure in dental implant placement, and hardware failure or malocclusion in mandibular fracture fixation. Additionally, medico-legal disclaimers were not included in any of the drafts. In the Transparency domain, none of the generated out- puts disclosed AI authorship or included advisories recom- mending clinician verification prior to use. These omissions highlight important gaps in ethical completeness, risk com- munication, and accountability, reinforcing the limitations identified through QUEST domain scoring.

  Keywords: domain generated consent drafts omissions risk implant failure included discussion representative revealed several recurring across
• Collaborative Care in PCOS: Evaluating the Role of Radiologist and Gynecologist in Diagnosis and Management of PCOS (2026) · doi

  This study has some limitations, along with its strengths. It involves a cross-sectional design, avoiding informal conclusions using convenience sampling from a single private healthcare institution, limiting generalizability. It does not include the assessment of biochemical markers, androgen levels, and lipid levels. DECLARATION Ethical consideration: This study strictly adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki and relevant national and institutional ethical guidelines. Informed consent was obtained. All procedures performed in this study were consistent with the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was conducted according to ethical standards for research involving human participants. Ethical considerations and approval were obtained from the Institutional Review Boards of hospitals. A written consent form was collected from all patients with assurance of confidentiality as well as privacy of their data. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. Consent for publication: The authors give consent for publication. Availability of data and materials: Data could be provided subject to a written request from the corresponding author. Funding source: Not applicable. Acknowledgement: The authors are thankful to the respondents for their timely support. Use of artificial intelligence (AI)- Assisted Technology for Manuscript Preparation: No AI tools were used for data extraction, statistical analysis, result interpretation, or the generation of original scientific content. All analyses were conducted by the authors, and they take full responsibility for the integrity and accuracy of the manuscript; however, we used AI for our questionnaire alignments, yet no AI was involved in conducting the test for the analysis. Similarity Index/ Plagiarism: The similarity index was checked, and it is 6% that is well below the threshold value of 19%, whereas each source is less > 5%. Authors' Contribution: Aqsa Ghulam Ahmad: Data analysis, preparation of tables, manuscript editing, and data entry in SPSS. Muqadas Rafique: Data collection. Hamna Abbas: Preparation of the first draft, manuscript writing. Rimsha Munir: SPSS data entry. Ali Akhtar: reviewing, supervision. Waqas Akram: reviewing, supervision, and final approval of manuscript. Open Access Public Health & Health Administration Review 154 Multidisciplinary Publishing Institute (SMC-Private) Limited Ahmad, A.G., Rafique, M., Abbas, H., Munir, R., Akhtar, A., & Akram, W. 2026, 4(2) REFERENCES Akram, M., & Roohi, N. (2015). Endocrine correlates of polycystic ovary syndrome in Pakistani women. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak, 25(1), 22-26. Asuncion, M., Calvo, R. M., San Millán, J. L., Sancho, J., Avila, S.,

  Keywords: ethical authors manuscript consent declaration preparation akram private levels helsinki institutional obtained standards conducted approval