psychology3 papersavg year 2019quality 6/5weak evidence

However, the understanding of the factors involved in both the rise and efficacy of leadership remains controversial, as different researchers present fairly divergent conclusions.

Research gap analysis derived from 3 psychology papers in our local library.

The gap

However, the understanding of the factors involved in both the rise and efficacy of leadership remains controversial, as different researchers present fairly divergent conclusions.

Consensus across the literature

Clustered from 3 gap mentions across 3 papers via embedding cosine ≥ 0.62.

Research trend

Established — well-defined area with open sub-problems.

Supporting evidence — 3 representative gaps

  • TRAIT AND BEHAVIORAL THEORIES OF LEADERSHIP: AN INTEGRATION AND META‐ANALYTIC TEST OF THEIR RELATIVE VALIDITY (2011) · doi

    Leader behaviors tend to explain more variance in leadership effectiveness than leader traits, but results indicate that an integrative model where leader behaviors mediate the relationship between leader traits and effectiveness is warranted.

    Keywords: leader behaviors effectiveness traits tend explain variance leadership indicate integrative model mediate relationship warranted
  • How to study the efficacy of leadership: A research framework proposal (2026) · doi

    However, the understanding of the factors involved in both the rise and efficacy of leadership remains controversial, as different researchers present fairly divergent conclusions.

    Keywords: understanding factors involved rise efficacy leadership remains controversial different researchers present fairly divergent conclusions
  • Role of leader and followers' well-being, engagement and the moderating role of psychological capital (2021) · doi

    Despite an immense amount of research on authentic leadership, how and when authentic leadership is more or less effective in promoting the well-being and work engagement of followers is little known.

    Keywords: authentic leadership despite immense amount less effective promoting well engagement followers little known

Explore this gap further

Search “However, the understanding of the factors involved in both the rise and efficacy of leadership remains controversial, as different researchers present fairly divergent conclusions.” across open scholarly engines for the latest related literature.

Working on this gap? Publish with us.

Science AI Journal reviews manuscripts in under 15 minutes with 8 specialised AI reviewers calibrated on 23,000+ real peer reviews. Open access, CC BY 4.0.

Related gaps in Psychology

Command palette

Jump anywhere, run any action.