psychology3 papersavg year 2018quality 6/5weak evidence

In terms of discriminant validity, results of Study 1 indicated that the postulated sub-components were insufficient to explain a large amount of variance in working memory span tasks, in Study 2 the

Research gap analysis derived from 3 psychology papers in our local library.

The gap

In terms of discriminant validity, results of Study 1 indicated that the postulated sub-components were insufficient to explain a large amount of variance in working memory span tasks, in Study 2 the same was demonstrated for reasoning task

Consensus across the literature

Clustered from 3 gap mentions across 3 papers via embedding cosine ≥ 0.62.

Research trend

Established — well-defined area with open sub-problems.

Supporting evidence — 3 representative gaps

  • No evidence of intelligence improvement after working memory training: A randomized, placebo-controlled study. (2012) · doi

    Many published working memory training studies suffer from design limitations (no-contact control groups, single measures of cognitive constructs), mixed results (transfer of training gains to some tasks but not others, inconsistent transfer to the same tasks across studies), and lack of theoretical grounding (identifying the mechanisms responsible for observed transfer).

    Keywords: transfer training tasks published working memory suffer design limitations contact control groups single measures cognitive
  • Cognitive Training: A Field in Search of a Phenomenon (2022) · doi

    Recent meta-analyses summarizing the extent empirical evidence have resolved the apparent lack of consensus in the field and led to a crystal-clear conclusion: The overall effect of far transfer is null, and there is little to no true variability between the types of cognitive training.

    Keywords: recent meta analyses summarizing extent empirical evidence resolved apparent lack consensus field crystal clear conclusion
  • Towards a Process Model of Sustained Attention Tests (2019) · doi

    In terms of discriminant validity, results of Study 1 indicated that the postulated sub-components were insufficient to explain a large amount of variance in working memory span tasks, in Study 2 the same was demonstrated for reasoning tasks.

    Keywords: tasks terms discriminant validity postulated components insufficient explain large amount variance working memory span reasoning

Explore this gap further

Search “In terms of discriminant validity, results of Study 1 indicated that the postulated sub-components were insufficient to explain a large amount of variance in working memory span tasks, in Study 2 the ” across open scholarly engines for the latest related literature.

Working on this gap? Publish with us.

Science AI Journal reviews manuscripts in under 15 minutes with 8 specialised AI reviewers calibrated on 23,000+ real peer reviews. Open access, CC BY 4.0.

Related gaps in Psychology

Command palette

Jump anywhere, run any action.