social_science2 papersavg year 2022quality 3/5moderate evidence

Residency Program Evaluations

Research gap analysis derived from 2 social_science papers in our local library.

The gap

There is a need to evaluate and scale wellness interventions across multiple residency programs, specialties, and institutions, particularly in urban settings beyond Family Medicine.

Consensus across the literature

The papers collectively establish the importance of evaluating wellness interventions but leave open their scalability and generalizability.

Research trend

Established — well-defined area with open sub-problems.

Supporting evidence — 2 representative gaps

  • Health and wellness among incoming resident physicians: A multi-domain survey (2018) · doi

    The study does not address scalability of wellness interventions across different residency programs, specialties, or institutions.

    Keywords: address scalability wellness interventions across different residency programs specialties institutions
  • Evaluation of a Resident Wellness Curriculum: A Cross-Sectional Survey in an Internal Medicine Residency Program (2026) · doi

    Implementation should be evaluated across multiple residency programs and specialties.

    Keywords: implementation evaluated across multiple residency programs specialties

Working on this gap? Publish with us.

Science AI Journal reviews manuscripts in under 15 minutes with 8 specialised AI reviewers calibrated on 23,000+ real peer reviews. Open access, CC BY 4.0.

Related gaps in social_science

Command palette

Jump anywhere, run any action.