engineering2 papersavg year 2026quality 4/5moderate evidence

Security and Evaluation

Research gap analysis derived from 2 engineering papers in our local library.

The gap

There is a need for comprehensive security evaluations, including performance under high load, transparency, and usability across different contexts, in systems that manage protection settings, monitor senior citizens, and authenticate users.

Consensus across the literature

The papers collectively establish the importance of security evaluations but leave open specific methods and contexts for such evaluations.

Research trend

Emerging — attention growing, methods still coalescing.

Supporting evidence — 3 representative gaps

  • Optimizing Protection Settings at PT PLN (PERSERO) UP2D Lampung through User-Centered Design and Model-View-Controller Architecture (2026) · doi

    Future work may explore the performance of the system under high-load and security evaluation, as this can give deeper insights into how well it performs while managing large-scale data, along with its risks.

    Keywords: future explore performance system high load security evaluation give deeper insights well performs managing large
  • Quorum Seal: Cross-Sensor Challenge and Response Attestation for Compromise Detection with Adaptive Multi-Surface Verification (2026) · doi

    Future evaluation should compare not only security outcomes but also transparency, operator trust, and decision usability across different deployment contexts.

    Keywords: future evaluation compare security outcomes transparency operator trust decision usability across different deployment contexts
  • Optimizing Protection Settings at PT PLN (PERSERO) UP2D Lampung through User-Centered Design and Model-View-Controller Architecture (2026) · doi

    No security evaluation or penetration testing results were reported for the system.

    Keywords: security evaluation penetration testing reported system

Working on this gap? Publish with us.

Science AI Journal reviews manuscripts in under 15 minutes with 8 specialised AI reviewers calibrated on 23,000+ real peer reviews. Open access, CC BY 4.0.

Related gaps in engineering

Command palette

Jump anywhere, run any action.