Short-term follow-up
Research gap analysis derived from 5 medicine papers in our local library.
The gap
Most studies lack long-term follow-up beyond 12 months to assess durability and sustainability of interventions in various clinical populations.
Consensus across the literature
Papers collectively leave open the need for extended follow-up periods to evaluate long-term outcomes.
Research trend
Emerging — attention growing, methods still coalescing.
Supporting evidence — 5 representative gaps
- Closed reduction of midline palatal fracture using a palatal acrylic splint and interdental wiring: case report (2026) · doi
A minimum follow-up duration of 6 to 12 months is generally recommended to fully evaluate the stability of the maxillary arch width and bone healing, which was not achieved in this case.
Keywords: minimum follow duration months generally recommended fully evaluate stability maxillary arch width bone healing achieved - Benchmarking large language models for congenital cataract parent counseling: safety, readability, and knowledge translation of developmental and genetic information (2026) · doi
The study adopted a zero-shot, single-turn question-answering setting without case-specific details or multi-turn follow-up, which may under- or overestimate performance under real-world interactive use.
Keywords: turn adopted zero shot single question answering setting without case specific details multi follow overestimate - Correction: Exercise training affects hemodynamics and exercise capacity in cases of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a non-randomized controlled trial in individuals aged 65–80 years (2026) · doi
Long-term follow-up data beyond the 5-month intervention period are needed to determine the durability of hemodynamic and exercise capacity improvements
Keywords: long term follow beyond month intervention period needed determine durability hemodynamic exercise capacity improvements - Case Report: Cor triatriatum sinister presenting as acute decompensated heart failure in an adolescent (2026) · doi
The case report is limited by its single-case design and relatively short hemodynamic follow-up period.
Keywords: case report limited single design relatively short hemodynamic follow period - Case Report: Minimally invasive management of torsion in a giant ovarian cyst in an obese child: a single-port approach combined with extracorporeal cystectomy (2026) · doi
This report describes a single case with limited follow-up, and its generalizability requires further validation.
Keywords: report describes single case limited follow generalizability requires further validation
Working on this gap? Publish with us.
Science AI Journal reviews manuscripts in under 15 minutes with 8 specialised AI reviewers calibrated on 23,000+ real peer reviews. Open access, CC BY 4.0.
Related gaps in medicine
- Diagnostic and Prognostic MarkersFurther validation is needed to establish standardized criteria for MRI and sonoelastography in differentiating phyllodes tumors from fibroa…
- Research Method ValidationFurther validation of AI systems and biomarkers is needed across diverse clinical settings and patient populations to ensure safe and effect…
- Validation Across ConditionsFurther studies are needed to confirm the reproducibility and effectiveness of proposed methods under different conditions, including full-s…
- Generalizability of FindingsMost studies lack external validation in diverse populations or settings, questioning the generalizability of their findings.