Specifically, the criterion, subjective change in cognition, remains controversial in light of growing evidence that subjective reports are inadequate predictors of genuine cognitive impairment.

The gap

Consensus across the literature

Supporting evidence — 3 representative gaps

• The Great Debate: General Ability and Specific Abilities in the Prediction of Important Outcomes (2018) · doi

  It provides an overview of the debate, explains the motivation for the special issue and two types of submissions solicited, and briefly illustrates how differing conceptualizations of cognitive abilities demand different analytic strategies for predicting criteria, and that these different strategies can yield conflicting findings about the real-world importance of general versus specific abilities.

  Keywords: abilities different strategies provides overview debate explains motivation special issue types submissions solicited briefly illustrates
• Diagnosing Mild Cognitive Impairment as a Precursor to Dementia: Fact or Fallacy? (2016) · doi

  Specifically, the criterion, subjective change in cognition, remains controversial in light of growing evidence that subjective reports are inadequate predictors of genuine cognitive impairment.

  Keywords: subjective specifically criterion change cognition remains controversial light growing evidence reports inadequate predictors genuine cognitive
• Decision‐making competence and cognitive abilities: Which abilities matter? (2021) · doi

  Even though multiple cognitive abilities have been shown to predict decision‐making competence, few studies have incorporated a large test battery tapping into several cognitive abilities concurrently in the same models.

  Keywords: cognitive abilities even though multiple predict decision making competence incorporated large test battery tapping several