education4 papersavg year 2015quality 7/5weak evidence

Technology integration in education transcends the mere implementation of technological artefacts, encompassing theoretical frameworks and evidence-based research findings to enhance pedagogical pract

Research gap analysis derived from 4 education papers in our local library.

The gap

Technology integration in education transcends the mere implementation of technological artefacts, encompassing theoretical frameworks and evidence-based research findings to enhance pedagogical practices rather than being limited to the ru

Consensus across the literature

Clustered from 4 gap mentions across 4 papers via embedding cosine ≥ 0.62.

Research trend

Established — well-defined area with open sub-problems.

Supporting evidence — 4 representative gaps

  • Integrating Digital Technology in Christian Religious Education: A Theological Framework for Faith Formation in the Digital Age (2026) · doi

    Moreover, without careful planning and clear pedagogical objectives, the use of technology may become a source of distraction that hinders learning rather than supports it. In this regard, teachers play a crucial role in designing, managing, and guiding the use of technology to ensure that it genuinely supports meaningful learning rather than functioning merely as an additional tool (Selwyn, 2021). Challenges and Risks of Technology Integration (A Critical Analysis) education, Although the integration of digital technology including Christian Religious in

    Keywords: technology learning rather supports integration without careful planning clear pedagogical objectives become source distraction hinders
  • Effect of Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge Framework based Capacity Building Programme Module (CBPM) on Teaching Aptitude of Pre-Service Teachers (2024) · doi

    Technology integration in education transcends the mere implementation of technological artefacts, encompassing theoretical frameworks and evidence-based research findings to enhance pedagogical practices rather than being limited to the rudimentary application of computer hardware and software in instructional delivery.

    Keywords: technology integration education transcends mere implementation technological artefacts encompassing theoretical frameworks evidence based enhance pedagogical
  • If There Is No Significant Difference, Why Should We Care? (2005) · doi

    The three primary obstacles to integrating technology with education in these disciplines are identified as: 1) the limited evidence of online education in the fields of architecture and design (Sagun, Demirkan, & Goktepe, 2001); 2) the reluctance of design educators to teach in an online environment (Bender & Good, 2003); and 3) the lack of multidisciplinary coursework currently available between architecture, design, and other related fields (IIDA Report, 1998).

    Keywords: design education online fields architecture three primary obstacles integrating technology disciplines identified limited evidence sagun
  • Developing a Collaborative Multidisciplinary Online Design Course (2005) · doi

    The three primary obstacles to integrating technology with education in these disciplines are identified as: 1) the limited evidence of online education in the fields of architecture and design (Sagun, Demirkan, & Goktepe, 2001); 2) the reluctance of design educators to teach in an online environment (Bender & Good, 2003); and 3) the lack of multidisciplinary coursework currently available between architecture, design, and other related fields (IIDA Report, 1998).

    Keywords: design education online fields architecture three primary obstacles integrating technology disciplines identified limited evidence sagun

Explore this gap further

Search “Technology integration in education transcends the mere implementation of technological artefacts, encompassing theoretical frameworks and evidence-based research findings to enhance pedagogical pract” across open scholarly engines for the latest related literature.

Working on this gap? Publish with us.

Science AI Journal reviews manuscripts in under 15 minutes with 8 specialised AI reviewers calibrated on 23,000+ real peer reviews. Open access, CC BY 4.0.

Related gaps in Education

Command palette

Jump anywhere, run any action.