agriculture3 papersavg year 2019quality 6/5weak evidence

The effect of volume of endodontic irrigants on the microhardness of root canal dentin has not been studied.

Research gap analysis derived from 3 agriculture papers in our local library.

The gap

The effect of volume of endodontic irrigants on the microhardness of root canal dentin has not been studied.

Consensus across the literature

Clustered from 3 gap mentions across 3 papers via embedding cosine ≥ 0.62.

Research trend

Established — well-defined area with open sub-problems.

Supporting evidence — 3 representative gaps

  • Histological observations of pulpal replacement tissue in immature dog teeth after revascularization of infected pulps (2015) · doi

    CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitation of this study, it can be concluded that residual pulp tissue can remain in the canals after revascularization procedures of immature teeth with artificially induced pulp infection.

    Keywords: pulp conclusions within limitation concluded residual tissue remain canals revascularization procedures immature teeth artificially induced
  • A critical analysis of research methods and experimental models to study irrigants and irrigation systems (2022) · doi

    Dissolution of pulp tissue remnants should be examined in the presence of dentine and, preferably, inside human root canals.

    Keywords: dissolution pulp tissue remnants examined presence dentine preferably inside human root canals
  • Influence of Volume of Endodontic Irrigants used in Different Irrigation Techniques on Root Canal Dentin Microhardness (2021) · doi

    The effect of volume of endodontic irrigants on the microhardness of root canal dentin has not been studied.

    Keywords: effect volume endodontic irrigants microhardness root canal dentin studied

Explore this gap further

Search “The effect of volume of endodontic irrigants on the microhardness of root canal dentin has not been studied.” across open scholarly engines for the latest related literature.

Working on this gap? Publish with us.

Science AI Journal reviews manuscripts in under 15 minutes with 8 specialised AI reviewers calibrated on 23,000+ real peer reviews. Open access, CC BY 4.0.

Related gaps in Agriculture

Command palette

Jump anywhere, run any action.