Instead, though such rights may be necessary, a structural injustice approach demonstrates how they are insufficient to tackle the injustice of intra-EU TLM and other forms of temporary labor migratio

The gap

Consensus across the literature

Supporting evidence — 3 representative gaps

• Temporary Labor Migration within the EU as Structural Injustice (2018) · doi

  Instead, though such rights may be necessary, a structural injustice approach demonstrates how they are insufficient to tackle the injustice of intra-EU TLM and other forms of temporary labor migration more broadly.

  Keywords: injustice instead though rights necessary structural approach demonstrates insufficient tackle intra forms temporary labor migration
• The Inequality of Low-Wage Migrant Labour: Reflections on<i>PN v FR</i>and<i>OPT v Presteve Foods</i> (2018) · doi

  While these cases establish the positive role of human rights law in accounting for the wider context in which inequality impacts on migrant labour, this role is also inherently limited by the purpose, scope, and function of the Tribunals.

  Keywords: role cases establish positive human rights accounting wider context inequality impacts migrant labour inherently limited
• Precarity prevented or reinforced? Migrants' right to change employers in the recast of the EU Single Permit Directive (2024) · doi

  It is precisely this nexus between migrant rights and the protection of the national workforce that is central to the understudied question of whether and under what conditions migrant workers from third countries (i.

  Keywords: migrant precisely nexus rights protection national workforce central understudied question whether conditions workers third countries