PLoS Computational Biology

ISSN 1553-734x · Public Library of Science · United States · active 2005–2026

Metrics

Best Scimago quartile (2025)
Q1
Cites per paper (2y)
4.3
SJR
1.466
h-index
291

“Cites per paper” is a two-year cited-by rate computed from OpenAlex. It is not a Clarivate Journal Impact Factor — we neither compute nor license that metric (how the two differ). Citation rates differ enormously between fields, so compare within a discipline. What the other figures mean: journal quartile, SJR, h-index and article processing charge.

Data as of 18 October 2026 (venue index build).

Scimago Journal Rank 2025

In the Scimago Journal Rank 2025 edition, PLoS Computational Biology is Q1 in 6 of its 7 subject categories and Q2 in the other 1. Its best category quartile is Q1.

Scimago 2025 quartile and rank of PLoS Computational Biology in each subject category
Subject categoryQuartileRank in category
Computational Theory and MathematicsQ1#16 of 183
Modeling and SimulationQ1#21 of 335
EcologyQ1#46 of 496
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and SystematicsQ1#53 of 752
GeneticsQ1#68 of 370
Molecular BiologyQ1#104 of 425
Cellular and Molecular NeuroscienceQ2#28 of 102
Cites per document (2 years, Scopus)
3.50
Documents indexed in 2025 (Scopus)
878

The quartile is the one Scimago prints for each category. Rank is the journal's position by SJR among the journals Scimago lists in that category (#1 is the highest); “—” means we hold no rank consistent with that quartile. The document count is what Scopus indexed that year, which can be lower than a journal's full output. Source: SCImago Journal Rank 2025 edition, from Scopus data (scimagojr.com, CC BY-NC).

PLoS Computational Biology is Q1 in 6 of its 7 Scimago subject categories (2025 edition; best category Computational Theory and Mathematics: Q1, #16 of 183), with SJR 1.466 (Scimago) and an h-index of 291 (OpenAlex). Listed in DOAJ, Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed.

Is this the right journal for your paper?

The AI Journal Finder ranks the best-matched journals for your paper’s topic — with tier, open access, citation rate and predatory flags. Free to start.

Try the Journal Finder →

Responding time

Submission to acceptance
202 days (median)
Estimated from our library (445 papers)
Acceptance to publication
21 days (median)
Estimated from our library (438 papers)
Submission to publication
225 days (median)
Estimated from our library (438 papers)

Turnaround figures are indicative, not a guarantee: DOAJ values are self-reported by the journal (average weeks, submission to publication); library estimates are medians of the received/accepted dates printed in papers we hold. Editorial times vary by article type and season — confirm on the journal’s own site.

Indexing & access

Indexed in
DOAJScopusWeb of SciencePubMed
Access status:
gold. Where this comes from publisher-level signals rather than works-level data it is a heuristic — confirm on the journal’s own site, especially regarding any article processing charge.

Official journal site →

Scope

neuraldynamicsbrainfunctioncognitiveneurosciencebioinformaticsgenomicnetworksmolecularbiologygene

Frequently asked

Is PLoS Computational Biology a predatory journal?

Our screening does not flag PLoS Computational Biology. That is not a guarantee of quality — it means the venue is not on Beall's archive (frozen since 2017) and does not match our name-pattern heuristic. It is listed in DOAJ, Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, which is a positive signal.

Is PLoS Computational Biology indexed in Scopus or Web of Science?

Per our venue index, PLoS Computational Biology appears in: DOAJ, Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed. Index membership changes over time — confirm on the index's own site before relying on it.

What is the impact factor of PLoS Computational Biology?

Papers in PLoS Computational Biology are cited about 4.3 times each within two years of publication, and Scimago places it in Q1, with an h-index of 291. Those are the open equivalents: the Clarivate Journal Impact Factor is a proprietary metric we neither compute nor license, so we show the two-year citation rate and Scimago quartile instead — they answer the same question of how heavily the journal is cited. A citation rate is a property of a field as much as of a journal.

What Scimago quartile is PLoS Computational Biology (Q1, Q2, Q3, or Q4)?

In the Scimago Journal Rank 2025 edition, PLoS Computational Biology is Q1 in 6 of its 7 subject categories and Q2 in the other 1. By category: Computational Theory and Mathematics: Q1, #16 of 183; Modeling and Simulation: Q1, #21 of 335; Ecology: Q1, #46 of 496; Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics: Q1, #53 of 752; Genetics: Q1, #68 of 370; Molecular Biology: Q1, #104 of 425; Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience: Q2, #28 of 102. Its best category quartile is Q1. Quartiles split the journals in a subject category into four equal groups by SJR, so Q1 is the most-cited quarter and Q4 the least; PLoS Computational Biology is cited about 4.3 times per paper over two years, with an h-index of 291.

What is the Web of Science (JCR) quartile of PLoS Computational Biology?

The Web of Science quartile comes from Clarivate's Journal Citation Reports (JCR), a proprietary product we neither license nor compute — so we cannot state a JCR quartile for PLoS Computational Biology. The open equivalent is its best Scimago quartile, Q1 in Computational Theory and Mathematics and 5 other categories, derived from Scopus citation data. Because JCR ranks against Web of Science and Scimago against Scopus, the two can differ, so check Clarivate's site directly if you need the JCR quartile specifically.

Is PLoS Computational Biology open access?

Our index records its access status as "gold". Where this is derived from publisher-level signals rather than works-level data it is a heuristic, so confirm on the journal's own site — particularly if an article processing charge matters to you.

How long does PLoS Computational Biology take to publish a paper?

Submission to acceptance for PLoS Computational Biology takes about 202 days (median) — Estimated from our library (n=445 papers). Treat it as indicative rather than a guarantee: editorial times vary by article type, reviewer availability and season, and a self-reported figure is the journal's own. We do not hold a peer-review acceptance rate for PLoS Computational Biology.

Ready to submit? Tools for your next paper

How Pre-Check worksHow AI Review works

Compare the category — Honest roundups of the AI research tools, ours listed alongside the alternatives.

Similar venues

Compare it with its peers: Ranked Molecular Biology journals — ranked by Scimago quartile and cites per paper, predatory venues excluded.

Command palette

Jump anywhere, run any action.