How many papers support this gap analysis?

3 papers from our local library contribute to this synthesis, with an average publication year of 2023.

Can I get a manuscript addressing this gap reviewed here?

Yes — AI Review runs 8 specialised agents over the full PDF and returns a structured editorial report in one pass, for 30 credits. Start at /review. An open-access publication route is in preparation and is not open for submissions yet.

general3 papersavg year 2023weak evidence

Aiming to structure the academic debate

Research gap analysis derived from 3 general papers in our local library.

The gap

Aiming to structure the academic debate and to demonstrate practical use cases of social media in crisis communication, we present in this metastudy the disciplinary embedment, topical foci, challenges, and research gaps in the literature a

Evidence profile

Stated in the cells research gap and cells future research and abstract sections of the source papers, classified as general, drawn from work published between 2014 and 2026, spanning 3 journals. Those papers have been cited 4 times in total.

Research trend

Established — well-defined area with open sub-problems.

Supporting evidence — 4 representative gaps

Doświadczanie wojny w perspektywie autoetnograficznej. Analiza ram interpretacyjnych kryzysu (2026) · Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej · doi
The paper identifies a gap in the literature on the impact of media framings of crises on individual experiences. - The study notes that there is a need for more research on the ways in which everyday strategies can be used to mitigate the effects of crisis on individuals. - The paper highlights the importance of considering the social and cultural frameworks for making sense of crises in order to develop effective support strategies.
generalstated in cells research gapevidence 5/5
Keywords: paper identifies gap literature impact media framings crises
From Ebola to COVID-19 and beyond: analysing performative acts in global health crises (2026) · Frontiers in Communication · doi
The paper identifies a gap in the understanding of performative acts in global health crises, and the need for a nuanced analysis of how these acts shape crisis communication. - The paper highlights the importance of considering the social and political contexts of health emergencies, and the need to address the power dynamics and hierarchies that shape crisis communication.
generalstated in cells research gapevidence 5/5
Keywords: paper identifies gap understanding performative acts global health
From Ebola to COVID-19 and beyond: analysing performative acts in global health crises (2026) · Frontiers in Communication · doi
Future research should examine the role of performative acts in shaping crisis communication in different contexts and health emergencies. - Future research should consider the importance of reflexive and context-sensitive communication strategies in fostering more equitable and contextually grounded crisis responses.
generalstated in cells future researchevidence 5/5
Keywords: future research examine role performative acts shaping crisis
Crises and Social Media: A Metastudy on Pertinent Research and Practice (2014) · Human Technology · cited 4× · doi
Aiming to structure the academic debate and to demonstrate practical use cases of social media in crisis communication, we present in this metastudy the disciplinary embedment, topical foci, challenges, and research gaps in the literature and application of social media in crisis communication.
generalstated in abstractevidence 4/5
Keywords: social media crisis communication aiming structure academic debate demonstrate practical cases present metastudy disciplinary embedment

Questions about this gap

Aiming to structure the academic debate and to demonstrate practical use cases of social media in crisis communication, we present in this metastudy the disciplinary embedment, top… This is supported by 4 representative gap statements extracted from 3 papers, rated weak evidence.

Explore this gap further

Run this gap as a query across open scholarly engines for the latest related literature.

Find research gaps on this topic →Google Scholar ↗Semantic Scholar ↗OpenAlex ↗Europe PMC ↗CORE ↗

Working on this gap? Review it with us.

Science AI Journal reviews manuscripts in one pass with 8 specialised AI agents calibrated on 69,000+ real peer reviews.

Run an AI review Run a pre-submission check

Tools for your next paper

Pre-CheckIs your paper ready? A Tier 1–5 acceptance probability in seconds.Journal FinderA ranked shortlist of target journals from a 17,500-venue index.Duplicate Publication CheckerCheck prior-publication & salami-slicing risk across 8 sources.Citation GeneratorFreeA DOI or title → APA, MLA, Vancouver, Chicago, BibTeX, RIS. No signup.Graphical Abstract MakerFreeTurn your findings into a colorblind-safe graphical abstract.AI Review8 specialist agents return an editor-ready review of your full PDF.

Compare the category — Honest roundups of the AI research tools, ours listed alongside the alternatives.