Conflicts between wildlife conservation and agricultural

The gap

Evidence profile

Sourced from the stated challenges and abstract of the source papers, classified as general, drawn from work published between 2016 and 2026, spanning 3 journals.

Supporting evidence — 3 representative gaps

• Achieving Win–Win Outcomes for Ecological Conservation and Food Security through Payments for Grassland Ecosystem Services (2026) · Human Ecology · doi

  The paper identifies the challenge of balancing ecological conservation and food security. The study notes the difficulty in distinguishing between livestock populations in grazing and feedlot breeding due to data limitations. The paper highlights the need to address potential endogeneity in the empirical analysis.

  generalstated challenges
  Keywords: paper identifies challenge balancing ecological conservation food security
• The importance of timing in goose grazing effects on winter wheat yield (2026) · European Journal of Wildlife Research · doi

  Conflicts between wildlife conservation and agricultural interests. Limited understanding of the impact of goose grazing on winter wheat yield. Difficulty in developing effective mitigation strategies.

  generalstated challengesevidence 5/5
  Keywords: conflicts between wildlife conservation agricultural interests limited understanding
• Improved Spatially Disaggregated Livestock Measures for Uganda (2016) · Review of Regional Studies · doi

  This work shows a useful method that allows for a reliable spatial livestock analysis, whenever sectorial databases offer greater coverage of the population of interest, but more limited information than specialized surveys.

  generalabstractevidence 4/5
  Keywords: shows useful allows reliable spatial livestock whenever sectorial databases offer greater coverage population interest limited

Questions about this gap