How many papers support this gap analysis?

4 papers from our local library contribute to this synthesis, with an average publication year of 2013.

Can I get a manuscript addressing this gap reviewed here?

Yes — AI Review runs 8 specialised agents over the full PDF and returns a structured editorial report in one pass, for 30 credits. Start at /review. An open-access publication route is in preparation and is not open for submissions yet.

agriculture4 papersavg year 2013weak evidence

Crude oil bioremediation of soils is limited

Research gap analysis derived from 4 agriculture papers in our local library.

The gap

Crude oil bioremediation of soils is limited by the bacteria activity in degrading the spills hydrocarbons.

Evidence profile

Stated in the cells research gap and cells future research and abstract sections of the source papers, classified as general, drawn from work published between 1970 and 2026, spanning 3 journals. Those papers have been cited 5 times in total.

Research trend

Established — well-defined area with open sub-problems.

Supporting evidence — 5 representative gaps

A GEOTECHNICAL STUDY ON TWO SELECTED OIL-CONTAMINATED SOIL SITES (2026) · THE IRAQI JOURNAL FOR MECHANICAL AND MATERIALS ENGINEERING · doi
The lack of realistic data on the impact of oil contamination on geotechnical behavior of soil. - The need for effective treatment techniques for oil-contaminated soil.
generalstated in cells research gapevidence 5/5
Keywords: lack realistic data impact oil contamination geotechnical behavior
A GEOTECHNICAL STUDY ON TWO SELECTED OIL-CONTAMINATED SOIL SITES (2026) · THE IRAQI JOURNAL FOR MECHANICAL AND MATERIALS ENGINEERING · doi
Investigating the effectiveness of treatment techniques for oil-contaminated soil. - Analyzing the geotechnical behavior of oil-contaminated soil from different sites.
generalstated in cells future researchevidence 5/5
Keywords: investigating effectiveness treatment techniques oil-contaminated soil analyzing geotechnical
Hydrocarbon bioremediation in a karstic and leptosol soils from Mexico. The efficiency of soil inoculation on hydrocarbon removal (2026) · Brazilian Journal of Microbiology · doi
Further studies are needed to determine the long-term effects of the bioremediation method. - The application of the method to other types of contaminated soils should be investigated. - The identification of other bacterial strains associated with the biodegradation of petroleum-derived hydrocarbons is necessary.
generalstated in cells future researchevidence 4/5
Keywords: further studies needed determine long-term effects bioremediation method
Bioremediation Potential of Native Hydrocarbons Degrading Bacteria in Crude Oil Polluted Soil (2017) · Bulletin of University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca Agriculture · cited 5× · doi
Crude oil bioremediation of soils is limited by the bacteria activity in degrading the spills hydrocarbons.
generalstated in abstractevidence 3/5
Keywords: crude bioremediation soils limited bacteria activity degrading spills hydrocarbons
Evolution of the Microbioal Population in a Polluted Soil with Petroleum Hydrocarbons (1970) · Bulletin of University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca Agriculture · doi
Crude oil bioremediation of soils is limited by the bacteria activity in degrading the spills hydrocarbons.
generalstated in abstractevidence 3/5
Keywords: crude bioremediation soils limited bacteria activity degrading spills hydrocarbons

Questions about this gap

Crude oil bioremediation of soils is limited by the bacteria activity in degrading the spills hydrocarbons. This is supported by 5 representative gap statements extracted from 4 papers, rated weak evidence.

Explore this gap further

Run this gap as a query across open scholarly engines for the latest related literature.

Find research gaps on this topic →Google Scholar ↗Semantic Scholar ↗OpenAlex ↗Europe PMC ↗CORE ↗

Working on this gap? Review it with us.

Science AI Journal reviews manuscripts in one pass with 8 specialised AI agents calibrated on 69,000+ real peer reviews.

Run an AI review Run a pre-submission check

Tools for your next paper

Pre-CheckIs your paper ready? A Tier 1–5 acceptance probability in seconds.Journal FinderA ranked shortlist of target journals from a 17,500-venue index.Duplicate Publication CheckerCheck prior-publication & salami-slicing risk across 8 sources.Citation GeneratorFreeA DOI or title → APA, MLA, Vancouver, Chicago, BibTeX, RIS. No signup.Graphical Abstract MakerFreeTurn your findings into a colorblind-safe graphical abstract.AI Review8 specialist agents return an editor-ready review of your full PDF.

Compare the category — Honest roundups of the AI research tools, ours listed alongside the alternatives.