education3 papersavg year 2026weak evidence

Cultural and religious considerations are identified

Research gap analysis derived from 3 education papers in our local library.

The gap

Cultural and religious considerations are identified as important (M = 4.42), but concrete mechanisms for integrating Islamic ethical traditions into AI governance frameworks are not detailed.

Evidence profile

Sourced from the inline gaps and open questions of the source papers, classified as application gap, spanning 3 journals.

Research trend

Established — well-defined area with open sub-problems.

Supporting evidence — 4 representative gaps

  • Coping with AI: Islamic Principles for New Education Policy (2026) · Journal of Engineering Research and Education (JERE) · doi

    The recommendation to engage with international organizations such as UNESCO and OECD to contribute Islamic perspectives on AI ethics lacks specification of mechanisms for meaningful participation or how Islamic frameworks might be harmonized with existing global standards.

    application gapinline gapsevidence 5/5
    Keywords: islamic recommendation engage international organizations unesco oecd contribute perspectives ethics lacks specification mechanisms meaningful participation
  • Ethical and Value-Based Dimensions of Artificial Intelligence Integration in Saudi Higher Education: Faculty Perspectives from King Khalid University (2026) · International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research · doi

    Cultural and religious considerations are identified as important (M = 4.42), but concrete mechanisms for integrating Islamic ethical traditions into AI governance frameworks are not detailed.

    application gapopen questionsevidence 5/5
    Keywords: cultural religious considerations identified important concrete mechanisms integrating islamic ethical traditions governance frameworks detailed
  • INTEGRATING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN ISLAMIC EDUCATION: ETHICAL, PEDAGOGICAL, AND SUSTAINABILITY PERSPECTIVES (2026) · INTIHA: Islamic Education Journal · doi

    National and institutional regulatory frameworks for ethical AI use in Islamic education have been advocated but no comprehensive mapping exists of which countries or institutions have implemented such frameworks, what their specific content requirements are, or how they address content bias, theological accuracy, and cultural alignment across diverse Islamic educational contexts.

    application gapopen questionsevidence 5/5
    Keywords: regulatory framework ethical AI Islamic education policy theological accuracy content bias cultural alignment
  • Coping with AI: Islamic Principles for New Education Policy (2026) · Journal of Engineering Research and Education (JERE) · doi

    The paper proposes operationalizing the Islamic ethical framework through curricular integration, institutional governance, and research networks, but provides limited detail on how these mechanisms will be implemented in practice across diverse institutional contexts.

    application gapinline gapsevidence 4/5
    Keywords: institutional proposes operationalizing islamic ethical framework curricular integration governance networks provides limited detail mechanisms implemented

Questions about this gap

Cultural and religious considerations are identified as important (M = 4.42), but concrete mechanisms for integrating Islamic ethical traditions into AI governance frameworks are n… This is supported by 4 representative gap statements extracted from 3 papers, rated weak evidence.

Explore this gap further

Run this gap as a query across open scholarly engines for the latest related literature.

Working on this gap? Review it with us.

Science AI Journal reviews manuscripts in one pass with 8 specialised AI agents calibrated on 69,000+ real peer reviews.

Related gaps in Education

Command palette

Jump anywhere, run any action.