How many papers support this gap analysis?

3 papers from our local library contribute to this synthesis, with an average publication year of 2015.

Can I get a manuscript addressing this gap reviewed here?

Yes — AI Review runs 8 specialised agents over the full PDF and returns a structured editorial report in one pass, for 30 credits. Start at /review. An open-access publication route is in preparation and is not open for submissions yet.

general3 papersavg year 2015weak evidence

Further analysis of the ecological sustainability

Research gap analysis derived from 3 general papers in our local library.

The gap

Further analysis of the ecological sustainability of the fisheries. Investigation of the effectiveness of traditional management approaches in achieving sustainable resource use. Development of policies to support the development of long-ra

Evidence profile

Sourced from the future-work section and stated research gap of the source papers, classified as general, drawn from work published between 1986 and 2026, spanning 3 journals.

Research trend

Established — well-defined area with open sub-problems.

Supporting evidence — 4 representative gaps

Ecologically Sustainable Development: A Caribbean Fisheries Case Study (1986) · Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d études du développement · doi
Further analysis of the ecological sustainability of the fisheries. Investigation of the effectiveness of traditional management approaches in achieving sustainable resource use. Development of policies to support the development of long-range fleets and improve the sustainability of the fisheries.
generalfuture-work section
Keywords: further analysis ecological sustainability fisheries investigation effectiveness traditional
Sustainable Management of Northeastern Madagascar Halieutic Resources (2024) · International Journal of Marine Science · doi
The study identifies a research gap in the management of fishery resources in the Loky-Manambato marine protected area. The study notes that there is a lack of scientific studies on the seasonal closure of octopuses. The study also notes that there is a need for more research on the impact of overexploitation and environmental degradation on fishery resources.
generalstated research gapevidence 5/5
Keywords: study identifies research gap management fishery resources loky-manambato
Sustainable Management of Northeastern Madagascar Halieutic Resources (2024) · International Journal of Marine Science · doi
Future research should focus on the development of effective management strategies for fishery resources in the Loky-Manambato marine protected area. Future research should also investigate the impact of climate change on fishery resources in the area. Future research should also explore the potential of community-based management approaches for fishery resources.
generalfuture-work sectionevidence 5/5
Keywords: future research focus development effective management strategies fishery
APETRECHOS DA PESCA ARTESANAL EM CURURUPU, MARANHÃO, BRASIL (2026) · Revista Brasileira de Engenharia de Pesca · doi
Further research is needed to study the impact of climate change on the fishing activity in the region. Further research is needed to develop sustainable fishing practices in the region. Further research is needed to promote the participation of local communities in the management of natural resources.
generalfuture-work sectionevidence 4/5
Keywords: further research needed study impact climate change fishing

Questions about this gap

Further analysis of the ecological sustainability of the fisheries. Investigation of the effectiveness of traditional management approaches in achieving sustainable resource use. D… This is supported by 4 representative gap statements extracted from 3 papers, rated weak evidence.

Explore this gap further

Run this gap as a query across open scholarly engines for the latest related literature.

Find research gaps on this topic →Google Scholar ↗Semantic Scholar ↗OpenAlex ↗Europe PMC ↗CORE ↗

Working on this gap? Review it with us.

Science AI Journal reviews manuscripts in one pass with 8 specialised AI agents calibrated on 69,000+ real peer reviews.

Run an AI review Run a pre-submission check

Tools for your next paper

Pre-CheckIs your paper ready? A Tier 1–5 acceptance probability in seconds.Journal FinderA ranked shortlist of target journals from a 17,500-venue index.Duplicate Publication CheckerCheck prior-publication & salami-slicing risk across 8 sources.Citation GeneratorFreeA DOI or title → APA, MLA, Vancouver, Chicago, BibTeX, RIS. No signup.Graphical Abstract MakerFreeTurn your findings into a colorblind-safe graphical abstract.AI Review8 specialist agents return an editor-ready review of your full PDF.

Compare the category — Honest roundups of the AI research tools, ours listed alongside the alternatives.