How many papers support this gap analysis?

3 papers from our local library contribute to this synthesis, with an average publication year of 2025.

Can I get a manuscript addressing this gap reviewed here?

Yes — AI Review runs 8 specialised agents over the full PDF and returns a structured editorial report in one pass, for 30 credits. Start at /review. An open-access publication route is in preparation and is not open for submissions yet.

Science AI Journal

chemistry3 papersavg year 2025weak evidence

The overall performances of Li-S batteries

Research gap analysis derived from 3 chemistry papers in our local library.

The gap

However, the overall performances of Li-S batteries under practical working conditions are limited by the sluggish conversion kinetics of the sulfur cathodes.

Evidence profile

Stated in the cells research gap and abstract sections of the source papers, classified as general, drawn from work published between 2024 and 2026, spanning 3 journals. Those papers have been cited 116 times in total.

Research trend

Established — well-defined area with open sub-problems.

Supporting evidence — 3 representative gaps

Facilitating Selenium Conversion Kinetics in Li-Se Batteries via MOF-Integrated Electrodes (2026) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi
The study identifies the need to improve the conversion kinetics of Li2Se in Li-Se batteries. - The use of MOF-integrated electrodes is explored to address this gap.
generalstated in cells research gapevidence 5/5
Keywords: study identifies need improve conversion kinetics li2se li-se
Kinetic Promoters for Sulfur Cathodes in Lithium–Sulfur Batteries (2024) · Accounts of Chemical Research · cited 40× · doi
However, the overall performances of Li-S batteries under practical working conditions are limited by the sluggish conversion kinetics of the sulfur cathodes.
generalstated in abstractevidence 4/5
Keywords: overall performances batteries practical working conditions limited sluggish conversion kinetics sulfur cathodes
Quantitative Analysis of the Coupled Mechanisms of Lithium Plating, SEI Growth, and Electrolyte Decomposition in Fast Charging Battery (2024) · ACS Energy Letters · cited 76× · doi
Lithium ion battery (LIBs) degradation under fast-charging conditions limits its performance, yet systematic and quantitative studies of its mechanisms are still lacking.
generalstated in abstractevidence 4/5
Keywords: lithium battery libs degradation fast charging conditions limits performance systematic quantitative mechanisms still lacking

Questions about this gap

However, the overall performances of Li-S batteries under practical working conditions are limited by the sluggish conversion kinetics of the sulfur cathodes. This is supported by 3 representative gap statements extracted from 3 papers, rated weak evidence.

Explore this gap further

Run this gap as a query across open scholarly engines for the latest related literature.

Find research gaps on this topic →Google Scholar ↗Semantic Scholar ↗OpenAlex ↗Europe PMC ↗CORE ↗

Working on this gap? Review it with us.

Science AI Journal reviews manuscripts in one pass with 8 specialised AI agents calibrated on 69,000+ real peer reviews.

Run an AI review Run a pre-submission check

Tools for your next paper

Pre-CheckIs your paper ready? A Tier 1–5 acceptance probability in seconds.Journal FinderA ranked shortlist of target journals from a 17,500-venue index.Duplicate Publication CheckerCheck prior-publication & salami-slicing risk across 8 sources.Citation GeneratorFreeA DOI or title → APA, MLA, Vancouver, Chicago, BibTeX, RIS. No signup.Graphical Abstract MakerFreeTurn your findings into a colorblind-safe graphical abstract.AI Review8 specialist agents return an editor-ready review of your full PDF.

Compare the category — Honest roundups of the AI research tools, ours listed alongside the alternatives.