I argue that the right to privacy is important

The gap

Evidence profile

Stated in the cells future research and cells research gap and abstract sections of the source papers, classified as general, drawn from work published between 2014 and 2026, spanning 3 journals. Those papers have been cited 2 times in total.

Supporting evidence — 3 representative gaps

• The theoretical and legal foundations of privacy in the public sphere (2026) · Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta Nis · doi

  Future research could explore the implications of the concept of privacy as a dynamic, multidimensional subjective right for legal and social practice. - The study suggests the need for further analysis of the relationship between personal data protection and privacy.

  generalstated in cells future researchevidence 5/5
  Keywords: future research explore implications concept privacy dynamic multidimensional
• La Protección de Datos Personales en México y el Sistema Europeo (2026) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi

  The paper identifies a need for a better understanding of the evolution of the right to data protection. - There is a gap in the literature on the application of the theory of the essential content of fundamental rights in the digital environment.

  generalstated in cells research gapevidence 5/5
  Keywords: paper identifies need better understanding evolution right data
• Treating Inmates as Moral Agents: A Defense of the Right to Privacy in Prison (2014) · Criminal Justice Ethics · cited 2× · doi

  I argue that the right to privacy is important because of its connection to moral agency and that the protection of privacy is warranted by different established philosophical theories about the justification of legal punishment.

  generalstated in abstractevidence 4/5
  Keywords: privacy argue right important connection moral agency protection warranted different established philosophical theories justification legal

Questions about this gap