How many papers support this gap analysis?

3 papers from our local library contribute to this synthesis, with an average publication year of 2020.

Can I get a manuscript addressing this gap reviewed here?

Yes — AI Review runs 8 specialised agents over the full PDF and returns a structured editorial report in one pass, for 30 credits. Start at /review. An open-access publication route is in preparation and is not open for submissions yet.

psychology3 papersavg year 2020weak evidence

In addition to identifying gaps in the literature

Research gap analysis derived from 3 psychology papers in our local library.

The gap

In addition to identifying gaps in the literature such as the need for research using a two-component model of anxiety in relation to creativity, the authors' results have practical implications for those seeking to increase individual crea

Evidence profile

Stated in the abstract and cells research gap and cells future research sections of the source papers, classified as general, drawn from work published between 2011 and 2026, spanning 3 journals. Those papers have been cited 223 times in total.

Research trend

Established — well-defined area with open sub-problems.

Supporting evidence — 4 representative gaps

Creative Self-Efficacy: An Exploration of Its Antecedents, Consequences, and Applied Implications (2015) · The Journal of Psychology · cited 125× · doi
Our review used the theory of individual creative action and social cognitive theory as guiding frameworks to place creative self-efficacy in the creativity and innovation process, define creativity and innovation, explore how creative self-efficacy has been measured, examine the antecedents and consequences of creative self-efficacy, point out gaps in knowledge and offer suggestions for future research and provide some applied implications.
generalstated in abstractevidence 5/5
Keywords: creative self efficacy theory creativity innovation review used individual action social cognitive guiding frameworks place
Psychological Capital As A Predictor Of Creative Self-Efficacy: A Study Of Healthcare Employees (2026) · International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research · doi
There is a lack of research on the relationship between Psychological Capital and Creative Self-Efficacy in healthcare settings. - Prior studies have not investigated the relationship between Psychological Capital and Creative Self-Efficacy in specific organizational contexts.
generalstated in cells research gapevidence 5/5
Keywords: there lack research relationship between psychological capital creative
Psychological Capital As A Predictor Of Creative Self-Efficacy: A Study Of Healthcare Employees (2026) · International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research · doi
Future studies could benefit from larger and more varied samples, a longitudinal design, and additional variables. - Future research could investigate the relationship between Psychological Capital and Creative Self-Efficacy in different organizational contexts.
generalstated in cells future researchevidence 5/5
Keywords: future studies benefit larger varied samples longitudinal design
A Meta-Analytic Investigation of the Relationship of State and Trait Anxiety to Performance on Figural and Verbal Creative Tasks (2011) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · cited 98× · doi
In addition to identifying gaps in the literature such as the need for research using a two-component model of anxiety in relation to creativity, the authors' results have practical implications for those seeking to increase individual creativity.
generalstated in abstractevidence 4/5
Keywords: creativity addition identifying gaps literature need using component model anxiety relation authors practical implications seeking

Questions about this gap

In addition to identifying gaps in the literature such as the need for research using a two-component model of anxiety in relation to creativity, the authors' results have practica… This is supported by 4 representative gap statements extracted from 3 papers, rated weak evidence.

Explore this gap further

Run this gap as a query across open scholarly engines for the latest related literature.

Find research gaps on this topic →Google Scholar ↗Semantic Scholar ↗OpenAlex ↗Europe PMC ↗CORE ↗

Working on this gap? Review it with us.

Science AI Journal reviews manuscripts in one pass with 8 specialised AI agents calibrated on 69,000+ real peer reviews.

Run an AI review Run a pre-submission check

Tools for your next paper

Pre-CheckIs your paper ready? A Tier 1–5 acceptance probability in seconds.Journal FinderA ranked shortlist of target journals from a 17,500-venue index.Duplicate Publication CheckerCheck prior-publication & salami-slicing risk across 8 sources.Citation GeneratorFreeA DOI or title → APA, MLA, Vancouver, Chicago, BibTeX, RIS. No signup.Graphical Abstract MakerFreeTurn your findings into a colorblind-safe graphical abstract.AI Review8 specialist agents return an editor-ready review of your full PDF.

Compare the category — Honest roundups of the AI research tools, ours listed alongside the alternatives.