Investigating the relationship between religiosity and managerial behavior in other cultural contexts

The gap

Evidence profile

Sourced from the future-work section and limitations of the source papers, classified as general, drawn from work published between 1975 and 2026, spanning 3 journals. Those papers have been cited 4 times in total.

Supporting evidence — 3 representative gaps

• Religious Dimensions: Entities or Contructs? (1975) · Sociological Focus · cited 4× · doi

  The paper suggests that future research should focus on developing and testing scales using a more humble and methodologically sophisticated approach. The paper recommends that future research should consider the potential for hubris and methodological unsophistication in the development and use of religious scales. The paper proposes that future research should evaluate the utility of dimensions and scales in describing relationships and predicting outcomes.

  generalfuture-work sectionevidence 5/5
  Keywords: paper suggests future research focus developing testing scales
• Leadership style, conflict management behavior, and self-regulation among Uzbek managers: differential prediction by intrinsic and extrinsic religious orientation in a post-Soviet Muslim-majority workforce (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi

  Investigate the relationship between religiosity and managerial behavior in other cultural contexts, - Examine the role of intrinsic and extrinsic religiosity in predicting different aspects of managerial behavior, - Use a more diverse range of measures to assess religiosity and managerial behavior, - Conduct longitudinal studies to examine the causal relationships between religiosity and managerial behavior

  generalfuture-work sectionevidence 5/5
  Keywords: investigate relationship between religiosity managerial behavior other cultural
• Dindarlık Eğilimi ve Aile İçi Şiddet Farkındalığı Arasındaki İlişkide Toplumsal Cinsiyet Algısının Aracılık Rolü (2026) · Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi · doi

  The religiosity scale used in this study predominantly measures belief in God while neglecting dimensions such as worship and morality. Thus, the scale may fall short in examining the relationship between religiosity and perspectives on gender equality and violence. Future studies should utilize measurement tools that assess religiosity through dimensions such as faith, worship, and morality to explore these relationships in greater depth. Additionally, as this study is cross-sectional, longitudinal and mixed-method research designs would be beneficial for a more comprehensive understanding of the causal relationships between variables.

  generallimitationsevidence 4/5
  Keywords: religiosity scale dimensions worship morality relationships used predominantly measures belief neglecting thus fall short examining

Questions about this gap