How many papers support this gap analysis?

3 papers from our local library contribute to this synthesis, with an average publication year of 1990.

Can I get a manuscript addressing this gap reviewed here?

Yes — AI Review runs 8 specialised agents over the full PDF and returns a structured editorial report in one pass, for 30 credits. Start at /review. An open-access publication route is in preparation and is not open for submissions yet.

economics3 papersavg year 1990weak evidence

The nature of the new technology and some

Research gap analysis derived from 3 economics papers in our local library.

The gap

The nature of the new technology and some of its implications for the labour process in agriculture are identified and it is held that the distinction between biochemical innovations and mechanical innovations, to the extent that those who

Evidence profile

Sourced from the stated research gap and future-work section and abstract of the source papers, classified as general, drawn from work published between 1977 and 2026, spanning 3 journals. Those papers have been cited 142 times in total.

Research trend

Established — well-defined area with open sub-problems.

Supporting evidence — 4 representative gaps

Induced innovation and agricultural development (1977) · Food Policy · doi
The paper identifies a gap in the understanding of the factors influencing agricultural productivity and development. It notes that traditional economic models have limitations in understanding agricultural development. The paper highlights the need for a better understanding of the concept of induced innovation in the context of agricultural development.
generalstated research gap
Keywords: paper identifies gap understanding factors influencing agricultural productivity
Induced innovation and agricultural development (1977) · Food Policy · doi
The paper suggests that future research should focus on understanding the factors influencing agricultural productivity and development. It highlights the importance of analyzing the historical experience of countries like the USA and Japan to illustrate the theory of induced technical innovation. The paper suggests that future research should explore the role of induced innovation in promoting agricultural development.
generalfuture-work section
Keywords: paper suggests future research focus understanding factors influencing
The new technology, class formation and class action in the Indian countryside (1981) · The Journal of Peasant Studies · cited 142× · doi
The nature of the new technology and some of its implications for the labour process in agriculture are identified and it is held that the distinction between biochemical innovations and mechanical innovations, to the extent that those who make it argue that technological innovation can be limited to the former, is a false one.
generalabstractevidence 5/5
Keywords: innovations nature technology implications labour process agriculture identified held distinction biochemical mechanical extent make argue
State-owned enterprises drive sustainable development of agricultural enterprises: supply chain spillover effects based on new quality productivity of enterprises (2026) · Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems · doi
Future studies can explore the impact of state-owned enterprises on the development of new-quality productive forces among agricultural enterprises in different contexts. Future research can examine the role of other factors, such as technology and innovation, in promoting the development of new-quality productive forces among agricultural enterprises.
generalfuture-work sectionevidence 5/5
Keywords: future studies explore impact state-owned enterprises development new-quality

Questions about this gap

The nature of the new technology and some of its implications for the labour process in agriculture are identified and it is held that the distinction between biochemical innovatio… This is supported by 4 representative gap statements extracted from 3 papers, rated weak evidence.

Explore this gap further

Run this gap as a query across open scholarly engines for the latest related literature.

Find research gaps on this topic →Google Scholar ↗Semantic Scholar ↗OpenAlex ↗Europe PMC ↗CORE ↗

Working on this gap? Review it with us.

Science AI Journal reviews manuscripts in one pass with 8 specialised AI agents calibrated on 69,000+ real peer reviews.

Run an AI review Run a pre-submission check

Tools for your next paper

Pre-CheckIs your paper ready? A Tier 1–5 acceptance probability in seconds.Journal FinderA ranked shortlist of target journals from a 17,500-venue index.Duplicate Publication CheckerCheck prior-publication & salami-slicing risk across 8 sources.Citation GeneratorFreeA DOI or title → APA, MLA, Vancouver, Chicago, BibTeX, RIS. No signup.Graphical Abstract MakerFreeTurn your findings into a colorblind-safe graphical abstract.AI Review8 specialist agents return an editor-ready review of your full PDF.

Compare the category — Honest roundups of the AI research tools, ours listed alongside the alternatives.