How many papers support this gap analysis?

3 papers from our local library contribute to this synthesis, with an average publication year of 2026.

Can I get a manuscript addressing this gap reviewed here?

Yes — AI Review runs 8 specialised agents over the full PDF and returns a structured editorial report in one pass, for 30 credits. Start at /review. An open-access publication route is in preparation and is not open for submissions yet.

earth_science3 papersavg year 2026weak evidence

The need for effective management of climate risks

Research gap analysis derived from 3 earth_science papers in our local library.

The gap

The need for effective management of climate risks at the national and international level. - The lack of a comprehensive approach to quantify exposure to climate risks and visualize vulnerability to extreme weather events.

Evidence profile

Stated in the future work and cells research gap sections of the source papers, classified as general, spanning 3 journals.

Research trend

Established — well-defined area with open sub-problems.

Supporting evidence — 4 representative gaps

An interdisciplinary agenda to assess risks of climate extremes to nature’s contributions to people (2026) · Environmental Research Climate · doi
An interdisciplinary agenda to assess risks of climate extremes to nature’s contributions to people Sarah Hülsen1,2,∗, Cibele Amaral3,4,5, David N Bresch1,2, Meghan T Hayden6, Chahan M Kropf1,2, Anna LoPresti6, Kyle Manley3,5, Robert I McDonald7,8,9, Tyler L McIntosh3,10, Keiko J Nomura3,4, Timothy J Ohlert6, Katherine J Siegel3,10, Carmen B Steinmann1,2 and Laura E Dee6 1 Institute for Environmental Decisions ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland 2 Federal Office for Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss, Zürich, Switzerland 3 Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States of
generalstated in future workevidence 5/5
Keywords: rich institute environmental switzerland boulder interdisciplinary agenda assess risks climate extremes nature contributions people sarah
An interdisciplinary agenda to assess risks of climate extremes to nature’s contributions to people (2026) · Environmental Research Climate · doi
There is a need to integrate social-ecological dynamics with a climate risk perspective to address the impacts of climate extremes on nature's contributions to people. - There is a lack of consideration of climate risks in planning for nature-based solutions.
generalstated in cells research gapevidence 5/5
Keywords: there need integrate social-ecological dynamics climate risk perspective
APPLICATION OF CLIMATE INDEX SCORING IN NATIONAL CONTEXT: EVIDENCE FROM SERBIA AND CROATIA (2026) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi
The need for effective management of climate risks at the national and international level. - The lack of a comprehensive approach to quantify exposure to climate risks and visualize vulnerability to extreme weather events.
generalstated in cells research gapevidence 5/5
Keywords: need effective management climate risks national international level
Dimensions of Accumulated Climate Events and All-Cause Preventable Mortality Across County Disadvantage (2026) · Environmental Justice · doi
Little work explores local risks or the health effects of long-term exposure to multiple, overlapping events. - Understanding the health impacts of cumulative exposure to climate extremes at the subnational level is crucial to effective climate adaptation and public health interventions.
generalstated in cells research gapevidence 5/5
Keywords: little work explores local risks health effects long-term

Questions about this gap

Explore this gap further

Run this gap as a query across open scholarly engines for the latest related literature.

Find research gaps on this topic →Google Scholar ↗Semantic Scholar ↗OpenAlex ↗Europe PMC ↗CORE ↗

Working on this gap? Review it with us.

Science AI Journal reviews manuscripts in one pass with 8 specialised AI agents calibrated on 69,000+ real peer reviews.

Run an AI review Run a pre-submission check

Tools for your next paper

Pre-CheckIs your paper ready? A Tier 1–5 acceptance probability in seconds.Journal FinderA ranked shortlist of target journals from a 17,500-venue index.Duplicate Publication CheckerCheck prior-publication & salami-slicing risk across 8 sources.Citation GeneratorFreeA DOI or title → APA, MLA, Vancouver, Chicago, BibTeX, RIS. No signup.Graphical Abstract MakerFreeTurn your findings into a colorblind-safe graphical abstract.AI Review8 specialist agents return an editor-ready review of your full PDF.

Compare the category — Honest roundups of the AI research tools, ours listed alongside the alternatives.