The need to understand and make transparent the decisions
Research gap analysis derived from 3 computer_science papers in our local library.
The gap
The need to understand and make transparent the decisions of machine learning models in accounting and financial auditing. The lack of a systematic analysis of the literature on XAI in accounting and financial auditing. The limitations rela
Evidence profile
Sourced from the stated research gap and stated challenges of the source papers, classified as general, spanning 3 journals.
Research trend
Established — well-defined area with open sub-problems.
Supporting evidence — 4 representative gaps
- Bibliometric Analysis of Fraud Detection in the Fintech Sector (2026) · West Science Interdisciplinary Studies · doi
The study identifies a research gap in the field of fraud detection in the fintech sector, particularly in the areas of artificial intelligence and machine learning. The study highlights the need for more research on the development of innovative AI-based fraud detection methods, security based on blockchain technology, and intelligent risk management strategies.
generalstated research gapevidence 5/5Keywords: study identifies research gap field fraud detection fintech - A Machine Learning Approach to Audit Modification Risk Prediction in Financial Reporting: Methods, Data, and Human-Centered Challenges (2026) · Journal of risk and financial management · doi
Prior fraud-detection studies rely on raw numeric ratios, which limit interpretability. Most approaches frame the problem as a purely algorithmic classification task and offer limited interpretability for auditors, regulators, and decision-makers. The study identifies the need for a human-interpretable approach to audit modification risk prediction.
generalstated research gapevidence 5/5Keywords: prior fraud-detection studies rely raw numeric ratios limit - A Machine Learning Approach to Audit Modification Risk Prediction in Financial Reporting: Methods, Data, and Human-Centered Challenges (2026) · Journal of risk and financial management · doi
The study identifies the challenge of limited interpretability in prior fraud-detection studies. It notes the difficulty of integrating machine-learning systems into real-world financial reporting and audit-risk assessment workflows. The study highlights the need for human-centered challenges related to model interpretability, decision support, and the integration of machine-learning systems into real-world financial reporting and audit-risk assessment workflows.
generalstated challengesevidence 5/5Keywords: study identifies challenge limited interpretability prior fraud-detection studies - Explainable artificial intelligence in accounting and financial auditing: a systematic review (2026) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi
The need to understand and make transparent the decisions of machine learning models in accounting and financial auditing. The lack of a systematic analysis of the literature on XAI in accounting and financial auditing. The limitations related to computational cost, data quality, explanation stability, and regulatory adaptation.
generalstated research gapevidence 5/5Keywords: need understand make transparent decisions machine learning models
Questions about this gap
Explore this gap further
Run this gap as a query across open scholarly engines for the latest related literature.
Working on this gap? Review it with us.
Science AI Journal reviews manuscripts in one pass with 8 specialised AI agents calibrated on 69,000+ real peer reviews.
Tools for your next paper
Related gaps in Computer Science
- Prior work has focused on individual-level collaborationPrior work has focused on individual-level collaboration and higher levels of collaboration, but the relationship between institutional type…
- None of these studies directly compares PINN solutionsNone of these studies directly compares PINN solutions for elliptic Dirichlet problems using standard L² boundary losses against solutions u…
- The reference benchmark thus functions as a neutralThe reference benchmark thus functions as a neutral analytical baseline rather than as a performance standard.
- Third, significant methodological inconsistencies existThird, significant methodological inconsistencies exist across studies. Researchers employ different performance indicators, data preprocess…