How many papers support this gap analysis?

3 papers from our local library contribute to this synthesis, with an average publication year of 1979.

Can I get a manuscript addressing this gap reviewed here?

Yes — AI Review runs 8 specialised agents over the full PDF and returns a structured editorial report in one pass, for 30 credits. Start at /review. An open-access publication route is in preparation and is not open for submissions yet.

social_science3 papersavg year 1979weak evidence

The paper identifies a gap in research on drinking norms

Research gap analysis derived from 3 social_science papers in our local library.

The gap

The paper identifies a gap in research on drinking norms, noting that there are no equivalent undertakings for drinking norms to the detailed empirical descriptions of drinking practices among the general population in the United States. Th

Evidence profile

Sourced from the future-work section and stated research gap of the source papers, classified as general, drawn from work published between 1975 and 1985, spanning 3 journals.

Research trend

Established — well-defined area with open sub-problems.

Supporting evidence — 3 representative gaps

Part two: A preliminary reconnaissance into the persistence and explanation of ethnic subcultural drinking patterns (1978) · Medical Anthropology · doi
The paper suggests that future research should continue to develop and refine the socialization model. It highlights the need for further study of the role of family drinking problems and drinking environment in shaping drinking patterns. The paper notes that future research should aim to explain the remaining differences in drinking patterns that are not accounted for by the model.
generalfuture-work section
Keywords: paper suggests future research continue develop refine socialization
Normative Perspectives on Alcohol Use and Problems (1975) · Journal of Drug Issues · doi
The paper identifies a gap in research on drinking norms, noting that there are no equivalent undertakings for drinking norms to the detailed empirical descriptions of drinking practices among the general population in the United States. The paper suggests that the normative structure of drinking has had remarkably little discussion and even less research.
generalstated research gap
Keywords: paper identifies gap research drinking norms noting there
PUBLIC DRINKING IN CANADA: A NATIONAL STUDY OF A LEISURE ACTIVITY (1985) · Loisir et Société / Society and Leisure · doi
Further analysis of the data is needed to explore the relationships between public drinking and other aspects of drinking patterns and socio-demographic variables. Studies can investigate the social functions of public drinking in more depth. Research can examine the differences in drinking patterns and preferences across different regions and populations.
generalfuture-work section
Keywords: further analysis data needed explore relationships between public

Questions about this gap

The paper identifies a gap in research on drinking norms, noting that there are no equivalent undertakings for drinking norms to the detailed empirical descriptions of drinking pra… This is supported by 3 representative gap statements extracted from 3 papers, rated weak evidence.

Explore this gap further

Run this gap as a query across open scholarly engines for the latest related literature.

Find research gaps on this topic →Google Scholar ↗Semantic Scholar ↗OpenAlex ↗Europe PMC ↗CORE ↗

Working on this gap? Review it with us.

Science AI Journal reviews manuscripts in one pass with 8 specialised AI agents calibrated on 69,000+ real peer reviews.

Run an AI review Run a pre-submission check

Tools for your next paper

Pre-CheckIs your paper ready? A Tier 1–5 acceptance probability in seconds.Journal FinderA ranked shortlist of target journals from a 17,500-venue index.Duplicate Publication CheckerCheck prior-publication & salami-slicing risk across 8 sources.Citation GeneratorFreeA DOI or title → APA, MLA, Vancouver, Chicago, BibTeX, RIS. No signup.Graphical Abstract MakerFreeTurn your findings into a colorblind-safe graphical abstract.AI Review8 specialist agents return an editor-ready review of your full PDF.

Compare the category — Honest roundups of the AI research tools, ours listed alongside the alternatives.