The relationship between digital literacy levels
Research gap analysis derived from 3 education papers in our local library.
The gap
The relationship between digital literacy levels of faculty and student learning outcomes is implied but not systematically investigated or theoretically modeled.
Evidence profile
Sourced from the open questions and inline gaps of the source papers, classified as theory gap, spanning 3 journals.
Research trend
Established — well-defined area with open sub-problems.
Supporting evidence — 3 representative gaps
- El rol del docente universitario en la evaluación del aprendizaje real en tiempos de inteligencia artificial (2026) · LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades · doi
Teacher digital competence and institutional regulation are identified as decisive factors, but the specific mechanisms for their development and implementation in higher education contexts remain underexplored.
theory gapopen questionsevidence 4/5Keywords: teacher digital competence institutional regulation identified decisive factors specific mechanisms development implementation higher education contexts - The Influence of Principals’ Technological Leadership and Teachers’ Digital Competence on The Readiness For Implementing Coding and Artificial Intelligence-Based Learning in Senior High Schools in Langowan District (2026) · International Journal of Science and Environment (IJSE) · doi
Although teachers' digital competence shows a significant effect, without strong leadership support, teachers' competence alone is not sufficient to drive systemic implementation, indicating need for further investigation of this interaction.
theory gapinline gapsevidence 4/5Keywords: teachers competence digital shows significant effect without strong leadership support alone sufficient drive systemic implementation - Digitalization of Educational Process at Modern Universities: Evaluation of Positive and Negative Impact (2026) · Artificial Intelligence · doi
The relationship between digital literacy levels of faculty and student learning outcomes is implied but not systematically investigated or theoretically modeled.
theory gapinline gapsevidence 4/5Keywords: relationship digital literacy levels faculty student learning outcomes implied systematically investigated theoretically modeled
Questions about this gap
Explore this gap further
Run this gap as a query across open scholarly engines for the latest related literature.
Working on this gap? Review it with us.
Science AI Journal reviews manuscripts in one pass with 8 specialised AI agents calibrated on 69,000+ real peer reviews.
Tools for your next paper
Related gaps in Education
- Big data and AI in educational research require attentionBig data and AI in educational research require attention to issues of scale, context, and ethics in implementation.
- The positive relationship between AI use and motivationThe positive relationship between AI use and motivation should be understood as potential support offered by technology, not as the sole fac…
- Biology learning outcomes remain low, potentially dueBiology learning outcomes remain low, potentially due to inadequate utilization of laboratory facilities and practicum activities.
- The effectiveness of ChatGPT in complementing teacherThe effectiveness of ChatGPT in complementing teacher assessment of undergraduate academic writing requires systematic evaluation.