The study identifies a gap in the existing literature regarding the critical examination
Research gap analysis derived from 3 engineering papers in our local library.
The gap
The study identifies a gap in the existing literature regarding the critical examination of the role of generative AI in the scientific research process. The analysis highlights the need for a more nuanced understanding of the applications,
Evidence profile
Sourced from the stated research gap and future-work section of the source papers, classified as general, spanning 3 journals.
Research trend
Established — well-defined area with open sub-problems.
Supporting evidence — 3 representative gaps
- Generative artificial intelligence and the transformation of the scientific research process through a critical review of the research cycle (2026) · Iberoamerican Journal of Science Measurement and Communication · doi
The study identifies a gap in the existing literature regarding the critical examination of the role of generative AI in the scientific research process. The analysis highlights the need for a more nuanced understanding of the applications, benefits, and limitations of generative AI in the research process.
generalstated research gapKeywords: study identifies gap existing literature regarding critical examination - From the click race to the citation game: a conceptual exploration of the shift from search engine optimisation to generative engine optimisation (2026) · Information Research an international electronic journal · doi
The study suggests that future research should focus on empirical studies of generative search, information authority, and information practices shaped by artificial intelligence. The study highlights the need for further research on the implications of generative engine optimisation for content producers and information seekers.
generalfuture-work sectionevidence 5/5Keywords: study suggests future research focus empirical studies generative - Exploring the Impact of Generative AI on Public Engagement and Information Dynamics (2026) · Media and Communication · doi
There is a gap in research on generative AI, with existing studies often focusing on single systems and being largely situated in Western or Global North contexts. Empirical work frequently examines perceptions or short-term evaluations rather than everyday usage practices, motivations, and longer-term consequences for information behavior.
generalstated research gapevidence 5/5Keywords: there gap research generative existing studies often focusing
Questions about this gap
Explore this gap further
Run this gap as a query across open scholarly engines for the latest related literature.
Working on this gap? Review it with us.
Science AI Journal reviews manuscripts in one pass with 8 specialised AI agents calibrated on 69,000+ real peer reviews.
Tools for your next paper
Related gaps in Engineering
- The main difficulty in packet level simulationThe main difficulty in packet level simulation is the enormous computational power, i.e., speed and memory requirements needed to execute al…
- The effectiveness of AI-assisted design in differentThe effectiveness of AI-assisted design in different contexts. Future studies should explore the decision-making patterns of designers using…
- These continues fabrication to hinder The gapThese continues fabrication to hinder The gap between localized material design and macroscopic the practical electrode implementation of Si…
- Exploring emerging trends in circular business modelsExploring emerging trends in circular business models for sustainable infrastructure Beyond the European context, circular economy models ar…