How many papers support this gap analysis?

3 papers from our local library contribute to this synthesis, with an average publication year of 2026.

Can I get a manuscript addressing this gap reviewed here?

Yes — AI Review runs 8 specialised agents over the full PDF and returns a structured editorial report in one pass, for 30 credits. Start at /review. An open-access publication route is in preparation and is not open for submissions yet.

computer_science3 papersavg year 2026weak evidence

The study identifies a gap in the literature

Research gap analysis derived from 3 computer_science papers in our local library.

The gap

The study identifies a gap in the literature on the development of generative artificial intelligence in business and management. - The study aims to fill this gap by providing insights into the development of generative artificial intellig

Evidence profile

Stated in the future work and cells research gap and cells future research sections of the source papers, classified as general, spanning 3 journals. Those papers have been cited 1 times in total.

Research trend

Established — well-defined area with open sub-problems.

Supporting evidence — 3 representative gaps

Publication Exploring the Views of Hospitality Professionals on LinkedIn on the Impact of Generative AI: Focusing on Text Mining (2026) · TEM Journal · cited 1× · doi
and challenges opportunities, implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International journal of information management, 71, 102642. Doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642 on. Mogaji, E., Viglia, G., Srivastava, P., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2024). Is it the end of the technology acceptance model artificial of intelligence?. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 36(10), 3324-3339. generative the era in. Aguinis, H., Beltran, J. R., & Cope, A. (2024). How to use generative AI as a human resource management assistant. Organizational Dynamics, 53(1), 101029. Doi: 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2024.101029.. Ooi, K. B., et al. (2025). The potential of generative artificial intelligence across disciplines: Perspectives and future directions. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 65(1), 76-107. Doi: 10.1080/08874417.2023.2261010. Naing, S. Z. S., & Udomwong, P. (2024). Public Opinions on ChatGPT: An Analysis of Reddit Discussions by Using Sentiment Analysis, Topic Modeling, Analysis. Data Intelligence, 6(2), 344-374. Doi: 10.1162/dint_a_00250 SWOT and. Zhang, W., Yan, R., & Yuan, L. (2024). How generative AI was mentioned in social media and academic field? A text mining based on internet text data. IEEE Access, 12, 43940-43947. Doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3379010.. Perloff, R. M. (1993). The dynamics of persuasion: Communication and attitudes in the 21st century. Routledge.. Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in of education.
generalstated in future workevidence 5/5
Keywords: generative international journal management intelligence challenges information technology artificial dynamics text access education opportunities implications
The Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in the Field of Business: A Bibliometric Analysis (2026) · Trends in Business and Economics · doi
The study identifies a gap in the literature on the development of generative artificial intelligence in business and management. - The study aims to fill this gap by providing insights into the development of generative artificial intelligence in business and management.
generalstated in cells research gapevidence 5/5
Keywords: study identifies gap literature development generative artificial intelligence
Adoption of generative AI at the Italian institute for astrophysics: a survey on usage trends, ethics, literacy, and Shadow IT (2026) · Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences · doi
Further research is needed to understand the long-term impact of generative AI on scientific workflows. - There is a need to develop strategies to address the hidden digital divide and ensure equal access to premium tools. - Research is needed to develop effective AI literacy and training programs.
generalstated in cells future researchevidence 5/5
Keywords: further research needed understand long-term impact generative scientific

Questions about this gap

The study identifies a gap in the literature on the development of generative artificial intelligence in business and management. - The study aims to fill this gap by providing ins… This is supported by 3 representative gap statements extracted from 3 papers, rated weak evidence.

Explore this gap further

Run this gap as a query across open scholarly engines for the latest related literature.

Find research gaps on this topic →Google Scholar ↗Semantic Scholar ↗OpenAlex ↗Europe PMC ↗CORE ↗

Working on this gap? Review it with us.

Science AI Journal reviews manuscripts in one pass with 8 specialised AI agents calibrated on 69,000+ real peer reviews.

Run an AI review Run a pre-submission check

Tools for your next paper

Pre-CheckIs your paper ready? A Tier 1–5 acceptance probability in seconds.Journal FinderA ranked shortlist of target journals from a 17,500-venue index.Duplicate Publication CheckerCheck prior-publication & salami-slicing risk across 8 sources.Citation GeneratorFreeA DOI or title → APA, MLA, Vancouver, Chicago, BibTeX, RIS. No signup.Graphical Abstract MakerFreeTurn your findings into a colorblind-safe graphical abstract.AI Review8 specialist agents return an editor-ready review of your full PDF.

Compare the category — Honest roundups of the AI research tools, ours listed alongside the alternatives.