How many papers support this gap analysis?

3 papers from our local library contribute to this synthesis, with an average publication year of 2024.

Can I get a manuscript addressing this gap reviewed here?

Yes — AI Review runs 8 specialised agents over the full PDF and returns a structured editorial report in one pass, for 30 credits. Start at /review. An open-access publication route is in preparation and is not open for submissions yet.

engineering3 papersavg year 2024weak evidence

The study identifies a gap in understanding how

Research gap analysis derived from 3 engineering papers in our local library.

The gap

The study identifies a gap in understanding how technological and non-technological innovations contribute to the implementation of circular business models. - The research addresses the lack of empirical evidence on the role of firm innova

Evidence profile

Stated in the abstract and cells research gap and cells future research sections of the source papers, classified as general, drawn from work published between 2019 and 2026, spanning 3 journals. Those papers have been cited 200 times in total.

Research trend

Established — well-defined area with open sub-problems.

Supporting evidence — 4 representative gaps

Collaboration as an enabler for circular economy: a case study of a developing country (2019) · Management Decision · cited 200× · doi
Purpose The purpose of this paper is twofold: first, to advance the knowledge of Circular Business Models (BMs) over linear models by focusing on new dynamics which are unique to developing countries and have mostly been overlooked by contemporary literature; and second, to bring to the fore aspects of human-sphere which are currently under-researched in the circular economy (CE) domain.
generalstated in abstractevidence 5/5
Keywords: purpose circular models twofold first advance knowledge business linear focusing dynamics unique developing countries mostly
The determining role of firm innovativeness in the implementation of circular business models (2026) · Management · doi
The study identifies a gap in understanding how technological and non-technological innovations contribute to the implementation of circular business models. - The research addresses the lack of empirical evidence on the role of firm innovativeness in implementing circular business models.
generalstated in cells research gapevidence 5/5
Keywords: study identifies gap understanding technological non-technological innovations contribute
Innovación y economía circular: impacto en la rentabilidad del sector retail latinoamericano (2018–2023) (2026) · Ciencia Sociales y Económicas · doi
Further research can explore the application of circular economy strategies in other sectors. - Future studies can investigate the long-term effects of circular economy practices on financial sustainability. - Research can also focus on the development of new circular economy models and their implementation in retail companies.
generalstated in cells future researchevidence 5/5
Keywords: further research explore application circular economy strategies other
The determining role of firm innovativeness in the implementation of circular business models (2026) · Management · doi
Future research should investigate the role of firm innovativeness in implementing circular business models in other industries and countries. - The study suggests that further research is needed to develop a more comprehensive framework for analyzing the role of innovativeness in circular business model implementation.
generalstated in cells future researchevidence 4/5
Keywords: future research investigate role firm innovativeness implementing circular

Questions about this gap

The study identifies a gap in understanding how technological and non-technological innovations contribute to the implementation of circular business models. - The research address… This is supported by 4 representative gap statements extracted from 3 papers, rated weak evidence.

Explore this gap further

Run this gap as a query across open scholarly engines for the latest related literature.

Find research gaps on this topic →Google Scholar ↗Semantic Scholar ↗OpenAlex ↗Europe PMC ↗CORE ↗

Working on this gap? Review it with us.

Science AI Journal reviews manuscripts in one pass with 8 specialised AI agents calibrated on 69,000+ real peer reviews.

Run an AI review Run a pre-submission check

Tools for your next paper

Pre-CheckIs your paper ready? A Tier 1–5 acceptance probability in seconds.Journal FinderA ranked shortlist of target journals from a 17,500-venue index.Duplicate Publication CheckerCheck prior-publication & salami-slicing risk across 8 sources.Citation GeneratorFreeA DOI or title → APA, MLA, Vancouver, Chicago, BibTeX, RIS. No signup.Graphical Abstract MakerFreeTurn your findings into a colorblind-safe graphical abstract.AI Review8 specialist agents return an editor-ready review of your full PDF.

Compare the category — Honest roundups of the AI research tools, ours listed alongside the alternatives.