How many papers support this gap analysis?

3 papers from our local library contribute to this synthesis, with an average publication year of 2026.

Can I get a manuscript addressing this gap reviewed here?

Yes — AI Review runs 8 specialised agents over the full PDF and returns a structured editorial report in one pass, for 30 credits. Start at /review. An open-access publication route is in preparation and is not open for submissions yet.

psychology3 papersavg year 2026weak evidence

Research on how emotional design influences single young

Research gap analysis derived from 3 psychology papers in our local library.

The gap

There is a lack of research on how emotional design influences single young adults' intention to accept AI virtual companion apps. The study aims to address this gap by examining the role of emotional experience in users' judgment of their

Evidence profile

Sourced from the stated research gap and future work of the source papers, classified as general, spanning 2 journals.

Research trend

Established — well-defined area with open sub-problems.

Supporting evidence — 4 representative gaps

Development and psychometric evaluation of the AI emotional engagement scale (2026) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi
Existing studies lack targeted applicability in capturing unique features of AI interactions. Traditional technology acceptance models or satisfaction scales do not account for parasocial relationships and emotional dependence in AI interactions. There is a need for a self-report instrument to assess users' level of AI Emotional Engagement with AI systems.
generalstated research gap
Keywords: existing studies lack targeted applicability capturing unique features
Warmth and competence in affective companion virtual humans: differential effects on behavioral intention via hedonic benefits (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi
The current literature lacks an understanding of the differential pathways of warmth and competence in affective companion virtual humans acceptance. There is a gap in understanding how social perceptions—specifically warmth and competence—privacy-related attitudes jointly influence behavioral intention towards affective companion virtual humans.
generalstated research gap
Keywords: current literature lacks understanding differential pathways warmth competence
Factors influencing single young adults’ intentions to accept AI virtual companion apps based on the theory of emotional design (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi
Grounded in emotional design theory, this research explored the factors influencing single young adults’ intentions to accept AI virtual companions. By integrating emotional design, technology acceptance, human–AI interaction, and digital companionship perspectives, the study examined how interaction quality, visual appeal, perceived personalization, and intelligent adaptability shape user experience and behavioral intention.
generalfuture workevidence 5/5
Keywords: emotional design interaction user experience grounded theory explored factors influencing single young adults intentions accept
Factors influencing single young adults’ intentions to accept AI virtual companion apps based on the theory of emotional design (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi
There is a lack of research on how emotional design influences single young adults' intention to accept AI virtual companion apps. The study aims to address this gap by examining the role of emotional experience in users' judgment of their intentions to continue using AI virtual companions.
generalstated research gapevidence 5/5
Keywords: there lack research emotional design influences single young

Questions about this gap

There is a lack of research on how emotional design influences single young adults' intention to accept AI virtual companion apps. The study aims to address this gap by examining t… This is supported by 4 representative gap statements extracted from 3 papers, rated weak evidence.

Explore this gap further

Run this gap as a query across open scholarly engines for the latest related literature.

Find research gaps on this topic →Google Scholar ↗Semantic Scholar ↗OpenAlex ↗Europe PMC ↗CORE ↗

Working on this gap? Review it with us.

Science AI Journal reviews manuscripts in one pass with 8 specialised AI agents calibrated on 69,000+ real peer reviews.

Run an AI review Run a pre-submission check

Tools for your next paper

Pre-CheckIs your paper ready? A Tier 1–5 acceptance probability in seconds.Journal FinderA ranked shortlist of target journals from a 17,500-venue index.Duplicate Publication CheckerCheck prior-publication & salami-slicing risk across 8 sources.Citation GeneratorFreeA DOI or title → APA, MLA, Vancouver, Chicago, BibTeX, RIS. No signup.Graphical Abstract MakerFreeTurn your findings into a colorblind-safe graphical abstract.AI Review8 specialist agents return an editor-ready review of your full PDF.

Compare the category — Honest roundups of the AI research tools, ours listed alongside the alternatives.