How many papers support this gap analysis?

3 papers from our local library contribute to this synthesis, with an average publication year of 2026.

Can I get a manuscript addressing this gap reviewed here?

Yes — AI Review runs 8 specialised agents over the full PDF and returns a structured editorial report in one pass, for 30 credits. Start at /review. An open-access publication route is in preparation and is not open for submissions yet.

earth_science3 papersavg year 2026weak evidence

Integrate social-ecological dynamics with a climate risk

Research gap analysis derived from 3 earth_science papers in our local library.

The gap

There is a need to integrate social-ecological dynamics with a climate risk perspective to address the impacts of climate extremes on nature's contributions to people. There is a lack of consideration of climate risks in planning for nature

Evidence profile

Sourced from the future work and stated research gap and future-work section of the source papers, classified as general, spanning 3 journals.

Research trend

Established — well-defined area with open sub-problems.

Supporting evidence — 4 representative gaps

An interdisciplinary agenda to assess risks of climate extremes to nature’s contributions to people (2026) · Environmental Research Climate · doi
An interdisciplinary agenda to assess risks of climate extremes to nature’s contributions to people Sarah Hülsen1,2,∗, Cibele Amaral3,4,5, David N Bresch1,2, Meghan T Hayden6, Chahan M Kropf1,2, Anna LoPresti6, Kyle Manley3,5, Robert I McDonald7,8,9, Tyler L McIntosh3,10, Keiko J Nomura3,4, Timothy J Ohlert6, Katherine J Siegel3,10, Carmen B Steinmann1,2 and Laura E Dee6 1 Institute for Environmental Decisions ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland 2 Federal Office for Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss, Zürich, Switzerland 3 Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States of
generalfuture workevidence 5/5
Keywords: rich institute environmental switzerland boulder interdisciplinary agenda assess risks climate extremes nature contributions people sarah
An interdisciplinary agenda to assess risks of climate extremes to nature’s contributions to people (2026) · Environmental Research Climate · doi
There is a need to integrate social-ecological dynamics with a climate risk perspective to address the impacts of climate extremes on nature's contributions to people. There is a lack of consideration of climate risks in planning for nature-based solutions.
generalstated research gapevidence 5/5
Keywords: there need integrate social-ecological dynamics climate risk perspective
Dimensions of Accumulated Climate Events and All-Cause Preventable Mortality Across County Disadvantage (2026) · Environmental Justice · doi
Little work explores local risks or the health effects of long-term exposure to multiple, overlapping events. Understanding the health impacts of cumulative exposure to climate extremes at the subnational level is crucial to effective climate adaptation and public health interventions.
generalstated research gapevidence 5/5
Keywords: little work explores local risks health effects long-term
Non-stationary dynamics of compound climate extremes: a WRF-CMIP6-GAMLSS framework for southeastern China (2026) · Natural hazards and earth system sciences · doi
Future studies can apply the study's framework to other regions to assess compound climate extremes. Future research can investigate the impacts of compound climate extremes on social, economic, and ecological systems. Future studies can explore the use of other models and datasets to assess compound climate extremes.
generalfuture-work sectionevidence 5/5
Keywords: future studies apply study framework other regions assess

Questions about this gap

There is a need to integrate social-ecological dynamics with a climate risk perspective to address the impacts of climate extremes on nature's contributions to people. There is a l… This is supported by 4 representative gap statements extracted from 3 papers, rated weak evidence.

Explore this gap further

Run this gap as a query across open scholarly engines for the latest related literature.

Find research gaps on this topic →Google Scholar ↗Semantic Scholar ↗OpenAlex ↗Europe PMC ↗CORE ↗

Working on this gap? Review it with us.

Science AI Journal reviews manuscripts in one pass with 8 specialised AI agents calibrated on 69,000+ real peer reviews.

Run an AI review Run a pre-submission check

Tools for your next paper

Pre-CheckIs your paper ready? A Tier 1–5 acceptance probability in seconds.Journal FinderA ranked shortlist of target journals from a 17,500-venue index.Duplicate Publication CheckerCheck prior-publication & salami-slicing risk across 8 sources.Citation GeneratorFreeA DOI or title → APA, MLA, Vancouver, Chicago, BibTeX, RIS. No signup.Graphical Abstract MakerFreeTurn your findings into a colorblind-safe graphical abstract.AI Review8 specialist agents return an editor-ready review of your full PDF.

Compare the category — Honest roundups of the AI research tools, ours listed alongside the alternatives.