This systematic review and meta-analysis therefore sought
Research gap analysis derived from 3 psychology papers in our local library.
The gap
This systematic review and meta-analysis therefore sought to provide clearer insight into the body of literature surrounding the benefits of nature on cognition for children and adolescents by providing a statistical synthesis of the confli
Evidence profile
Sourced from the abstract of the source papers, classified as general, drawn from work published between 2022 and 2024, all from Journal of Environmental Psychology. Those papers have been cited 161 times in total.
Research trend
Established — well-defined area with open sub-problems.
Supporting evidence — 3 representative gaps
- Restorative effects of exposure to nature on children and adolescents: A systematic review (2022) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · cited 85× · doi
To fill this gap in the literature, we conducted a systematic review aiming at systematically summarizing the accumulated evidence about the restorative effects of nature exposure on children and adolescents and reporting the main findings in terms of the restoration of (1) cognitive, (2) emotional, (3) social or (4) behavioural resources.
generalabstractevidence 5/5Keywords: fill literature conducted systematic review aiming systematically summarizing accumulated evidence restorative effects nature exposure children - The role of nature in emotion regulation processes: An evidence-based rapid review (2024) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · cited 39× · doi
These findings highlight the importance of further research on this topic and the need for enhanced methodological rigor in study designs and measurements tools to assess the association among individuals’ exposure to nature and the strategies they adopt to regulate their emotions.
generalabstractevidence 4/5Keywords: highlight importance further topic need enhanced methodological rigor designs measurements tools assess association among individuals - Benefits of nature exposure on cognitive functioning in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2024) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · cited 37× · doi
This systematic review and meta-analysis therefore sought to provide clearer insight into the body of literature surrounding the benefits of nature on cognition for children and adolescents by providing a statistical synthesis of the conflicting reports in this area.
generalabstractevidence 4/5Keywords: systematic review meta sought provide clearer insight body literature surrounding benefits nature cognition children adolescents
Questions about this gap
Explore this gap further
Run this gap as a query across open scholarly engines for the latest related literature.
Working on this gap? Review it with us.
Science AI Journal reviews manuscripts in one pass with 8 specialised AI agents calibrated on 69,000+ real peer reviews.
Tools for your next paper
Related gaps in Psychology
- Conclusions are limited by the inclusion of only someConclusions are limited by the inclusion of only some discrete emotions, exclusion of studies that did not elicit discrete emotions, few ava…
- Hearing rehabilitation with hearing aids and cochlearHearing rehabilitation with hearing aids and cochlear implants has been connected to increased communication, higher social engagement and d…
- Somatic symptoms are endorsed more stronglySomatic symptoms are endorsed more strongly than affective or cognitive symptoms of depression, suggesting a possible, but yet poorly define…
- Fifty-six families with a preschool child whose parentsFifty-six families with a preschool child whose parents varied widely in parental marital satisfaction were studied at two time points: at t…