Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society
ISSN 0024-4074 · Oxford University Press · United Kingdom · active 1887–2026
Metrics
- Best Scimago quartile (2025)
- Q1
- Cites per paper (2y)
- 1.8
- SJR
- 0.682
- h-index
- 119
“Cites per paper” is a two-year cited-by rate computed from OpenAlex. It is not a Clarivate Journal Impact Factor — we neither compute nor license that metric (how the two differ). Citation rates differ enormously between fields, so compare within a discipline. What the other figures mean: journal quartile, SJR, h-index and article processing charge.
Data as of 8 November 2026 (venue index build).
Scimago Journal Rank 2025
In the Scimago Journal Rank 2025 edition, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society is Q1 in 1 of its 2 subject categories and Q2 in the other 1. Its best category quartile is Q1.
| Subject category | Quartile | Rank in category |
|---|---|---|
| Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics | Q1 | #185 of 752 |
| Plant Science | Q2 | #146 of 566 |
- Cites per document (2 years, Scopus)
- 2.03
- Documents indexed in 2025 (Scopus)
- 84
The quartile is the one Scimago prints for each category. Rank is the journal's position by SJR among the journals Scimago lists in that category (#1 is the highest); “—” means we hold no rank consistent with that quartile. The document count is what Scopus indexed that year, which can be lower than a journal's full output. Source: SCImago Journal Rank 2025 edition, from Scopus data (scimagojr.com, CC BY-NC).
Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society is Q1 in 1 of its 2 Scimago subject categories (2025 edition; best category Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics: Q1, #185 of 752), with SJR 0.682 (Scimago) and an h-index of 119 (OpenAlex). Listed in Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed.
Is this the right journal for your paper?
The AI Journal Finder ranks the best-matched journals for your paper’s topic — with tier, open access, citation rate and predatory flags. Free to start.
Indexing & access
- Indexed in
- ScopusWeb of SciencePubMed
- Access status:
- hybrid. Where this comes from publisher-level signals rather than works-level data it is a heuristic — confirm on the journal’s own site, especially regarding any article processing charge.
Scope
Frequently asked
Is Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society a predatory journal?
Our screening does not flag Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. That is not a guarantee of quality — it means the venue is not on Beall's archive (frozen since 2017) and does not match our name-pattern heuristic. It is listed in Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, which is a positive signal.
Is Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society indexed in Scopus or Web of Science?
Per our venue index, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society appears in: Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed. Index membership changes over time — confirm on the index's own site before relying on it.
What is the impact factor of Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society?
Papers in Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society are cited about 1.8 times each within two years of publication, and Scimago places it in Q1, with an h-index of 119. Those are the open equivalents: the Clarivate Journal Impact Factor is a proprietary metric we neither compute nor license, so we show the two-year citation rate and Scimago quartile instead — they answer the same question of how heavily the journal is cited. A citation rate is a property of a field as much as of a journal.
What Scimago quartile is Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society (Q1, Q2, Q3, or Q4)?
In the Scimago Journal Rank 2025 edition, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society is Q1 in 1 of its 2 subject categories and Q2 in the other 1. By category: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics: Q1, #185 of 752; Plant Science: Q2, #146 of 566. Its best category quartile is Q1. Quartiles split the journals in a subject category into four equal groups by SJR, so Q1 is the most-cited quarter and Q4 the least; Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society is cited about 1.8 times per paper over two years, with an h-index of 119.
What is the Web of Science (JCR) quartile of Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society?
The Web of Science quartile comes from Clarivate's Journal Citation Reports (JCR), a proprietary product we neither license nor compute — so we cannot state a JCR quartile for Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. The open equivalent is its best Scimago quartile, Q1 in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, derived from Scopus citation data. Because JCR ranks against Web of Science and Scimago against Scopus, the two can differ, so check Clarivate's site directly if you need the JCR quartile specifically.
Is Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society open access?
Our index records its access status as "hybrid". Where this is derived from publisher-level signals rather than works-level data it is a heuristic, so confirm on the journal's own site — particularly if an article processing charge matters to you.
Ready to submit? Tools for your next paper
Similar venues
Compare it with its peers: Ranked Ecology journals — ranked by Scimago quartile and cites per paper, predatory venues excluded.