Colonial Latin American Review
ISSN 1060-9164 · Routledge · United Kingdom · active 1992–2026
Metrics
- Best Scimago quartile (2025)
- Q2
- Cites per paper (2y)
- 0.5
- SJR
- 0.191
- h-index
- 40
“Cites per paper” is a two-year cited-by rate computed from OpenAlex. It is not a Clarivate Journal Impact Factor — we neither compute nor license that metric (how the two differ). Citation rates differ enormously between fields, so compare within a discipline. What the other figures mean: journal quartile, SJR, h-index and article processing charge.
Data as of 8 November 2026 (venue index build).
Scimago Journal Rank 2025
In the Scimago Journal Rank 2025 edition, Colonial Latin American Review is Q2 in 1 of its 2 subject categories and Q4 in the other 1. Its best category quartile is Q2.
| Subject category | Quartile | Rank in category |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous) | Q2 | #346 of 817 |
| Geography, Planning and Development | Q4 | #648 of 853 |
- Cites per document (2 years, Scopus)
- 0.26
- Documents indexed in 2025 (Scopus)
- 21
OpenAlex counts about 0.5 citations per paper over two years; Scopus, through Scimago, counts 0.26 per document. The two databases index different journals, documents and citations, so the figures differ. Neither is a Clarivate Journal Impact Factor.
The quartile is the one Scimago prints for each category. Rank is the journal's position by SJR among the journals Scimago lists in that category (#1 is the highest); “—” means we hold no rank consistent with that quartile. The document count is what Scopus indexed that year, which can be lower than a journal's full output. Source: SCImago Journal Rank 2025 edition, from Scopus data (scimagojr.com, CC BY-NC).
Colonial Latin American Review is Q2 in 1 of its 2 Scimago subject categories (2025 edition; best category Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous): Q2, #346 of 817), with SJR 0.191 (Scimago) and an h-index of 40 (OpenAlex). Listed in Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed.
Is this the right journal for your paper?
The AI Journal Finder ranks the best-matched journals for your paper’s topic — with tier, open access, citation rate and predatory flags. Free to start.
Indexing & access
- Indexed in
- ScopusWeb of SciencePubMed
- Access status:
- hybrid. Where this comes from publisher-level signals rather than works-level data it is a heuristic — confirm on the journal’s own site, especially regarding any article processing charge.
Scope
Frequently asked
Is Colonial Latin American Review a predatory journal?
Our screening does not flag Colonial Latin American Review. That is not a guarantee of quality — it means the venue is not on Beall's archive (frozen since 2017) and does not match our name-pattern heuristic. It is listed in Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, which is a positive signal.
Is Colonial Latin American Review indexed in Scopus or Web of Science?
Per our venue index, Colonial Latin American Review appears in: Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed. Index membership changes over time — confirm on the index's own site before relying on it.
What is the impact factor of Colonial Latin American Review?
Papers in Colonial Latin American Review are cited about 0.5 times each within two years of publication, and Scimago places it in Q2, with an h-index of 40. Those are the open equivalents: the Clarivate Journal Impact Factor is a proprietary metric we neither compute nor license, so we show the two-year citation rate and Scimago quartile instead — they answer the same question of how heavily the journal is cited. A citation rate is a property of a field as much as of a journal.
What Scimago quartile is Colonial Latin American Review (Q1, Q2, Q3, or Q4)?
In the Scimago Journal Rank 2025 edition, Colonial Latin American Review is Q2 in 1 of its 2 subject categories and Q4 in the other 1. By category: Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous): Q2, #346 of 817; Geography, Planning and Development: Q4, #648 of 853. Its best category quartile is Q2. Quartiles split the journals in a subject category into four equal groups by SJR, so Q1 is the most-cited quarter and Q4 the least; Colonial Latin American Review is cited about 0.5 times per paper over two years, with an h-index of 40.
What is the Web of Science (JCR) quartile of Colonial Latin American Review?
The Web of Science quartile comes from Clarivate's Journal Citation Reports (JCR), a proprietary product we neither license nor compute — so we cannot state a JCR quartile for Colonial Latin American Review. The open equivalent is its best Scimago quartile, Q2 in Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous), derived from Scopus citation data. Because JCR ranks against Web of Science and Scimago against Scopus, the two can differ, so check Clarivate's site directly if you need the JCR quartile specifically.
Is Colonial Latin American Review open access?
Our index records its access status as "hybrid". Where this is derived from publisher-level signals rather than works-level data it is a heuristic, so confirm on the journal's own site — particularly if an article processing charge matters to you.
Ready to submit? Tools for your next paper
Similar venues
Compare it with its peers: Ranked Social Science journals — ranked by Scimago quartile and cites per paper, predatory venues excluded.