Current Medical Imaging Formerly Current Medical Imaging Reviews
ISSN 1573-4056 · Bentham Science Publishers · United Arab Emirates · active 1969–2026
Flagged for closer checking
Publisher listed on Beall's archive (frozen 2017). Cross-check with DOAJ and Think.Check.Submit before submission.
This is a screening signal, not a verdict. How this check works.
Metrics
- Scimago quartile
- Q3
- Cites per paper (2y)
- 1.1
- SJR
- 0.271
- h-index
- 47
“Cites per paper” is a two-year cited-by rate computed from OpenAlex. It is not a Clarivate Journal Impact Factor — we neither compute nor license that metric (how the two differ). Citation rates differ enormously between fields, so compare within a discipline. What the other figures mean: journal quartile, SJR, h-index and article processing charge.
Data as of 30 September 2026 (venue index build).
Is this the right journal for your paper?
The AI Journal Finder ranks the best-matched journals for your paper’s topic — with tier, open access, citation rate and predatory flags. Free to start.
Indexing & access
- Indexed in
- ScopusWeb of SciencePubMed
- Access status:
- hybrid. Where this comes from publisher-level signals rather than works-level data it is a heuristic — confirm on the journal’s own site, especially regarding any article processing charge.
Scope
Frequently asked
Is Current Medical Imaging Formerly Current Medical Imaging Reviews a predatory journal?
Our screening flags Current Medical Imaging Formerly Current Medical Imaging Reviews as a possible predatory venue because its publisher appears on Beall's archive, which has been frozen since 2017. Treat this as a prompt to check carefully, not a verdict: verify against DOAJ and Think. Check. Submit before submitting.
Is Current Medical Imaging Formerly Current Medical Imaging Reviews indexed in Scopus or Web of Science?
Per our venue index, Current Medical Imaging Formerly Current Medical Imaging Reviews appears in: Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed. Index membership changes over time — confirm on the index's own site before relying on it.
What is the impact factor of Current Medical Imaging Formerly Current Medical Imaging Reviews?
Papers in Current Medical Imaging Formerly Current Medical Imaging Reviews are cited about 1.1 times each within two years of publication, and Scimago places it in Q3, with an h-index of 47. Those are the open equivalents: the Clarivate Journal Impact Factor is a proprietary metric we neither compute nor license, so we show the two-year citation rate and Scimago quartile instead — they answer the same question of how heavily the journal is cited. A citation rate is a property of a field as much as of a journal.
What Scimago quartile is Current Medical Imaging Formerly Current Medical Imaging Reviews (Q1, Q2, Q3, or Q4)?
Scimago places Current Medical Imaging Formerly Current Medical Imaging Reviews in Q3 for its subject category. Quartiles split the journals in a field into four equal groups by SJR, so Q1 is the most-cited quarter and Q4 the least; Current Medical Imaging Formerly Current Medical Imaging Reviews is cited about 1.1 times per paper over two years, with an h-index of 47. A journal is ranked per subject category, so one spanning several fields can sit in different quartiles depending on the category.
What is the Web of Science (JCR) quartile of Current Medical Imaging Formerly Current Medical Imaging Reviews?
The Web of Science quartile comes from Clarivate's Journal Citation Reports (JCR), a proprietary product we neither license nor compute — so we cannot state a JCR quartile for Current Medical Imaging Formerly Current Medical Imaging Reviews. The open equivalent is its Scimago quartile, Q3, derived from Scopus citation data. Because JCR ranks against Web of Science and Scimago against Scopus, the two can differ, so check Clarivate's site directly if you need the JCR quartile specifically.
Is Current Medical Imaging Formerly Current Medical Imaging Reviews open access?
Our index records its access status as "hybrid". Where this is derived from publisher-level signals rather than works-level data it is a heuristic, so confirm on the journal's own site — particularly if an article processing charge matters to you.
Ready to submit? Tools for your next paper
Similar venues
Compare it with its peers: Ranked Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging journals — ranked by Scimago quartile and cites per paper, predatory venues excluded.