Edinburgh Journal of Botany

Our screening does not flag Edinburgh Journal of Botany. That is not a guarantee of quality — it means the venue is not on Beall's archive (frozen since 2017) and does not match our name-pattern heuristic. It is listed in DOAJ, Scopus, which is a positive signal.

Per our venue index, Edinburgh Journal of Botany appears in: DOAJ, Scopus. Index membership changes over time — confirm on the index's own site before relying on it.

Papers in Edinburgh Journal of Botany are cited about 0.3 times each within two years of publication, and Scimago places it in Q3, with an h-index of 42. Those are the open equivalents: the Clarivate Journal Impact Factor is a proprietary metric we neither compute nor license, so we show the two-year citation rate and Scimago quartile instead — they answer the same question of how heavily the journal is cited. A citation rate is a property of a field as much as of a journal.

In the Scimago Journal Rank 2025 edition, Edinburgh Journal of Botany is Q3 in all 2 of its subject categories. By category: Plant Science: Q3, #289 of 566; Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics: Q3, #431 of 752. Quartiles split the journals in a subject category into four equal groups by SJR, so Q1 is the most-cited quarter and Q4 the least; Edinburgh Journal of Botany is cited about 0.3 times per paper over two years, with an h-index of 42.

The Web of Science quartile comes from Clarivate's Journal Citation Reports (JCR), a proprietary product we neither license nor compute — so we cannot state a JCR quartile for Edinburgh Journal of Botany. The open equivalent is its Scimago quartile, Q3, derived from Scopus citation data. Because JCR ranks against Web of Science and Scimago against Scopus, the two can differ, so check Clarivate's site directly if you need the JCR quartile specifically.

Our index records its access status as "gold". Where this is derived from publisher-level signals rather than works-level data it is a heuristic, so confirm on the journal's own site — particularly if an article processing charge matters to you.

Free to publish — DOAJ lists no article processing charge (APC). So there is no fee for authors to publish in Edinburgh Journal of Botany. Fee policies change — confirm on the journal's own site before relying on it.

Submission to publication for Edinburgh Journal of Botany takes about ~51 wk — DOAJ self-reported. Treat it as indicative rather than a guarantee: editorial times vary by article type, reviewer availability and season, and a self-reported figure is the journal's own. We do not hold a peer-review acceptance rate for Edinburgh Journal of Botany.