Information Technologies and Learning Tools

Our screening does not flag Information Technologies and Learning Tools. That is not a guarantee of quality — it means the venue is not on Beall's archive (frozen since 2017) and does not match our name-pattern heuristic. It is listed in DOAJ, Web of Science, which is a positive signal.

Per our venue index, Information Technologies and Learning Tools appears in: DOAJ, Web of Science. Index membership changes over time — confirm on the index's own site before relying on it.

Papers in Information Technologies and Learning Tools are cited about 1.1 times each within two years of publication, with an h-index of 28. Those are the open equivalents: the Clarivate Journal Impact Factor is a proprietary metric we neither compute nor license, so we show the two-year citation rate and Scimago quartile instead — they answer the same question of how heavily the journal is cited. A citation rate is a property of a field as much as of a journal.

Our index records its access status as "gold". Where this is derived from publisher-level signals rather than works-level data it is a heuristic, so confirm on the journal's own site — particularly if an article processing charge matters to you.

Submission to publication for Information Technologies and Learning Tools takes about ~40 wk — DOAJ self-reported. Treat it as indicative rather than a guarantee: editorial times vary by article type, reviewer availability and season, and a self-reported figure is the journal's own. We do not hold a peer-review acceptance rate for Information Technologies and Learning Tools.