Príncipe de Viana

ISSN 0032-8472 · Institución Príncipe de Viana · ES · active 1928–2026

Metrics

Scimago quartile
Cites per paper (2y)
0.0
SJR
h-index
8

“Cites per paper” is a two-year cited-by rate computed from OpenAlex. It is not a Clarivate Journal Impact Factor — we neither compute nor license that metric. Citation rates differ enormously between fields, so compare within a discipline.

Is this the right journal for your paper?

The AI Journal Finder ranks the best-matched journals for your paper’s topic — with tier, open access, citation rate and predatory flags. Free to start.

Try the Journal Finder →

Indexing & access

PubMed

Access status: gold. Where this comes from publisher-level signals rather than works-level data it is a heuristic — confirm on the journal’s own site, especially regarding any article processing charge.

Scope

historicalartarchitectureconservationarchaeologicalarcheologymedievalarchaeologyearlyiberiaiberianclassics

Frequently asked

Is Príncipe de Viana a predatory journal?

Our screening does not flag Príncipe de Viana. That is not a guarantee of quality — it means the venue is not on Beall's archive (frozen since 2017) and does not match our name-pattern heuristic. It is listed in PubMed, which is a positive signal.

Is Príncipe de Viana indexed in Scopus or Web of Science?

Per our venue index, Príncipe de Viana appears in: PubMed. Index membership changes over time — confirm on the index's own site before relying on it.

What is the impact factor of Príncipe de Viana?

Papers in Príncipe de Viana are cited about 0.0 times each within two years of publication, with an h-index of 8. Those are the open equivalents: the Clarivate Journal Impact Factor is a proprietary metric we neither compute nor license, so we show the two-year citation rate and Scimago quartile instead — they answer the same question of how heavily the journal is cited. A citation rate is a property of a field as much as of a journal.

Is Príncipe de Viana open access?

Our index records its access status as "gold". Where this is derived from publisher-level signals rather than works-level data it is a heuristic, so confirm on the journal's own site — particularly if an article processing charge matters to you.

Ready to submit? Tools for your next paper

Compare the categoryHonest roundups of the AI research tools, ours listed alongside the alternatives.

Similar venues

Command palette

Jump anywhere, run any action.