Reproduction Fertility and Development
ISSN 1031-3613 · CSIRO Publishing · Australia · active 1989–2026
Metrics
- Best Scimago quartile (2025)
- Q2
- Cites per paper (2y)
- 0.6
- SJR
- 0.495
- h-index
- 110
“Cites per paper” is a two-year cited-by rate computed from OpenAlex. It is not a Clarivate Journal Impact Factor — we neither compute nor license that metric (how the two differ). Citation rates differ enormously between fields, so compare within a discipline. What the other figures mean: journal quartile, SJR, h-index and article processing charge.
Data as of 25 October 2026 (venue index build).
Scimago Journal Rank 2025
In the Scimago Journal Rank 2025 edition, Reproduction Fertility and Development is Q2 in 1 of its 7 subject categories, Q3 in 5 and Q4 in 1. Its best category quartile is Q2.
| Subject category | Quartile | Rank in category |
|---|---|---|
| Animal Science and Zoology | Q2 | #155 of 529 |
| Reproductive Medicine | Q3 | #54 of 101 |
| Developmental Biology | Q3 | #59 of 83 |
| Biotechnology | Q3 | #175 of 320 |
| Genetics | Q3 | #247 of 370 |
| Molecular Biology | Q3 | #309 of 425 |
| Endocrinology | Q4 | #102 of 132 |
- Cites per document (2 years, Scopus)
- 1.99
- Documents indexed in 2025 (Scopus)
- 55
OpenAlex counts about 0.6 citations per paper over two years; Scopus, through Scimago, counts 1.99 per document. The two databases index different journals, documents and citations, so the figures differ. Neither is a Clarivate Journal Impact Factor.
The quartile is the one Scimago prints for each category. Rank is the journal's position by SJR among the journals Scimago lists in that category (#1 is the highest); “—” means we hold no rank consistent with that quartile. The document count is what Scopus indexed that year, which can be lower than a journal's full output. Source: SCImago Journal Rank 2025 edition, from Scopus data (scimagojr.com, CC BY-NC).
Reproduction Fertility and Development is Q2 in 1 of its 7 Scimago subject categories (2025 edition; best category Animal Science and Zoology: Q2, #155 of 529), with SJR 0.495 (Scimago) and an h-index of 110 (OpenAlex). Listed in Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed.
Is this the right journal for your paper?
The AI Journal Finder ranks the best-matched journals for your paper’s topic — with tier, open access, citation rate and predatory flags. Free to start.
Indexing & access
- Indexed in
- ScopusWeb of SciencePubMed
- Access status:
- hybrid. Where this comes from publisher-level signals rather than works-level data it is a heuristic — confirm on the journal’s own site, especially regarding any article processing charge.
Scope
Frequently asked
Is Reproduction Fertility and Development a predatory journal?
Our screening does not flag Reproduction Fertility and Development. That is not a guarantee of quality — it means the venue is not on Beall's archive (frozen since 2017) and does not match our name-pattern heuristic. It is listed in Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, which is a positive signal.
Is Reproduction Fertility and Development indexed in Scopus or Web of Science?
Per our venue index, Reproduction Fertility and Development appears in: Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed. Index membership changes over time — confirm on the index's own site before relying on it.
What is the impact factor of Reproduction Fertility and Development?
Papers in Reproduction Fertility and Development are cited about 0.6 times each within two years of publication, and Scimago places it in Q2, with an h-index of 110. Those are the open equivalents: the Clarivate Journal Impact Factor is a proprietary metric we neither compute nor license, so we show the two-year citation rate and Scimago quartile instead — they answer the same question of how heavily the journal is cited. A citation rate is a property of a field as much as of a journal.
What Scimago quartile is Reproduction Fertility and Development (Q1, Q2, Q3, or Q4)?
In the Scimago Journal Rank 2025 edition, Reproduction Fertility and Development is Q2 in 1 of its 7 subject categories, Q3 in 5 and Q4 in 1. By category: Animal Science and Zoology: Q2, #155 of 529; Reproductive Medicine: Q3, #54 of 101; Developmental Biology: Q3, #59 of 83; Biotechnology: Q3, #175 of 320; Genetics: Q3, #247 of 370; Molecular Biology: Q3, #309 of 425; Endocrinology: Q4, #102 of 132. Its best category quartile is Q2. Quartiles split the journals in a subject category into four equal groups by SJR, so Q1 is the most-cited quarter and Q4 the least; Reproduction Fertility and Development is cited about 0.6 times per paper over two years, with an h-index of 110.
What is the Web of Science (JCR) quartile of Reproduction Fertility and Development?
The Web of Science quartile comes from Clarivate's Journal Citation Reports (JCR), a proprietary product we neither license nor compute — so we cannot state a JCR quartile for Reproduction Fertility and Development. The open equivalent is its best Scimago quartile, Q2 in Animal Science and Zoology, derived from Scopus citation data. Because JCR ranks against Web of Science and Scimago against Scopus, the two can differ, so check Clarivate's site directly if you need the JCR quartile specifically.
Is Reproduction Fertility and Development open access?
Our index records its access status as "hybrid". Where this is derived from publisher-level signals rather than works-level data it is a heuristic, so confirm on the journal's own site — particularly if an article processing charge matters to you.
Ready to submit? Tools for your next paper
Similar venues
- Indian Journal of Medical EthicsQ4 · Forum for Medical Ethics Society
- International Journal of Medical Students— · International Journal of Medical Students
- Revista Española de Geriatría y GerontologíaQ4 · Elsevier BV
- Medical Journal of IndonesiaQ4 · Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia
- Archives of Medicine and Health Sciences— · Medknow
- Current Developments in NutritionQ1 · Elsevier BV
Compare it with its peers: Ranked Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health journals — ranked by Scimago quartile and cites per paper, predatory venues excluded.