Sustainable Development of Mountain Territories

Our screening does not flag Sustainable Development of Mountain Territories. That is not a guarantee of quality — it means the venue is not on Beall's archive (frozen since 2017) and does not match our name-pattern heuristic. It is listed in Scopus, which is a positive signal.

Per our venue index, Sustainable Development of Mountain Territories appears in: Scopus. Index membership changes over time — confirm on the index's own site before relying on it.

Papers in Sustainable Development of Mountain Territories are cited about 0.8 times each within two years of publication, and Scimago places it in Q2, with an h-index of 19. Those are the open equivalents: the Clarivate Journal Impact Factor is a proprietary metric we neither compute nor license, so we show the two-year citation rate and Scimago quartile instead — they answer the same question of how heavily the journal is cited. A citation rate is a property of a field as much as of a journal.

In the Scimago Journal Rank 2025 edition, Sustainable Development of Mountain Territories is Q2 in 5 of its 6 subject categories and Q3 in the other 1. By category: Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous): Q2, #122 of 377; Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law: Q2, #192 of 424; Mechanical Engineering: Q2, #221 of 696; Geography, Planning and Development: Q2, #287 of 853; Sociology and Political Science: Q2, #422 of 1,477; Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment: Q3, #159 of 305. Its best category quartile is Q2. Quartiles split the journals in a subject category into four equal groups by SJR, so Q1 is the most-cited quarter and Q4 the least; Sustainable Development of Mountain Territories is cited about 0.8 times per paper over two years, with an h-index of 19.

The Web of Science quartile comes from Clarivate's Journal Citation Reports (JCR), a proprietary product we neither license nor compute — so we cannot state a JCR quartile for Sustainable Development of Mountain Territories. The open equivalent is its best Scimago quartile, Q2 in Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous) and 4 other categories, derived from Scopus citation data. Because JCR ranks against Web of Science and Scimago against Scopus, the two can differ, so check Clarivate's site directly if you need the JCR quartile specifically.

Our index records its access status as "gold". Where this is derived from publisher-level signals rather than works-level data it is a heuristic, so confirm on the journal's own site — particularly if an article processing charge matters to you.