Progress in AI adoption in medicine will depend
Research gap analysis derived from 4 medicine papers in our local library.
The gap
Progress in AI adoption in medicine will depend on balanced and responsible adoption rather than novelty and immediate integration, requiring further work on implementation frameworks.
Evidence profile
Sourced from the future work and limitations and open questions of the source papers, classified as methodology gap, drawn from work published between 2025 and 2026, spanning 4 journals. Those papers have been cited 2 times in total.
Research trend
Established — well-defined area with open sub-problems.
Supporting evidence — 4 representative gaps
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. Systems Anatomy, Decision Physiology, Hygiene of Use (2026) · Journal of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases · doi
Progress in AI adoption in medicine will depend on balanced and responsible adoption rather than novelty and immediate integration, requiring further work on implementation frameworks.
methodology gapfuture workevidence 5/5Keywords: adoption progress medicine depend balanced responsible rather novelty immediate integration requiring further implementation frameworks - Application of artificial intelligence in pediatric dentistry: a systematic review (2026) · Clinical Dentistry (Russia) · doi
AI is not yet widely applied in clinical practice due to limited training data, absence of methodology and standards for program development, unconfirmed value and usefulness of AI solutions, and underdeveloped issues of ethics and accountability for decisions made.
methodology gaplimitationsevidence 5/5Keywords: widely applied clinical practice limited training absence methodology standards program development unconfirmed value usefulness solutions - AI in medicine and traditional medicine - opportunities for healthcare transformation (2025) · Integrative Medicine Research · cited 2× · doi
The integration of traditional Chinese medicine with artificial intelligence has been surveyed for attitudes and perceptions from medical staff, but specific implementation protocols for TCM-AI systems across different clinical departments and patient populations remain underdeveloped and require standardized integration frameworks.
methodology gapopen questionsevidence 5/5Keywords: traditional Chinese medicine artificial intelligence integration clinical implementation standardization - Artificial intelligence and the future of physicians: replacement or partnership? (2026) · Khyber Medical University Journal · doi
Existing regulatory and accountability frameworks for AI deployment in clinical settings lack clearly operationalized responsibility structures, audit mechanisms, and bias mitigation strategies specific to AI-physician hybrid decision-making contexts. Concrete governance models defining human oversight requirements and transparency specifications for clinical AI systems need development.
methodology gapfuture workevidence 5/5Keywords: AI governance accountability framework bias mitigation clinical oversight transparency requirements
Questions about this gap
Explore this gap further
Run this gap as a query across open scholarly engines for the latest related literature.
Working on this gap? Review it with us.
Science AI Journal reviews manuscripts in one pass with 8 specialised AI agents calibrated on 69,000+ real peer reviews.
Tools for your next paper
Related gaps in Medicine
- The sample size of the study is relatively small,The sample size of the study is relatively small, and intraoperative influencing factors have not been included in previous literature.
- Small sample sizes in each treatment group (EFG n=5, PESmall sample sizes in each treatment group (EFG n=5, PE n=4, IVIg n=8), limiting statistical power and generalizability of findings across t…
- The underlying etiology for the developmentThe underlying etiology for the development of bronchiectasis in this patient is not fully explored or discussed in the case presentation.
- The generalizability and applicability of findingsThe generalizability and applicability of findings to diverse patient populations and healthcare settings is not addressed.