How many papers support this gap analysis?

4 papers from our local library contribute to this synthesis, with an average publication year of 2026.

Can I get a manuscript addressing this gap reviewed here?

Yes — AI Review runs 8 specialised agents over the full PDF and returns a structured editorial report in one pass, for 30 credits. Start at /review. An open-access publication route is in preparation and is not open for submissions yet.

general4 papersavg year 2026weak evidence

The absence of regulatory framework for the use

Research gap analysis derived from 4 general papers in our local library.

The gap

the absence of regulatory framework for the use of artificial intelligence in legal activities; - the lack of doctrinal approaches for courts to respond to deficiencies in procedural documents identified as cases of irresponsible use of AI

Evidence profile

Stated in the cells future research and cells research gap sections of the source papers, classified as general, spanning 4 journals. Those papers have been cited 1 times in total.

Research trend

Established — well-defined area with open sub-problems.

Supporting evidence — 4 representative gaps

Inteligência Artificial e o dever de racionalidade: os riscos da automatização de decisões (2026) · Revista DCS · doi
Future research should focus on the development of AI systems that are transparent and explainable. - The study of the impact of AI on judicial decision-making should be continued to ensure that the use of AI is consistent with the principles of the Democratic State of Law.
generalstated in cells future researchevidence 5/5
Keywords: future research focus development systems transparent explainable study
MEDENİ YARGILAMADA YAPAY ZEKÂ KULLANIMININ YARGILAMA İLKELERİYLE UYUMU (2026) · Akdeniz Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi · doi
There is a need for further research on the use of AI in civil proceedings, including empirical studies and comparative analyses. - The paper highlights the need for a more nuanced understanding of the potential risks and challenges associated with the use of AI in civil proceedings. - The paper identifies a gap in the existing literature on the use of AI in civil proceedings, particularly with regard to its impact on fundamental principles of justice.
generalstated in cells research gapevidence 5/5
Keywords: there need further research use civil proceedings including
Appeal with artificial intelligence hallucinations: conclusions for the future from a single case in criminal proceedings (2026) · Uzhhorod National University Herald Series Law · cited 1× · doi
the absence of regulatory framework for the use of artificial intelligence in legal activities; - the lack of doctrinal approaches for courts to respond to deficiencies in procedural documents identified as cases of irresponsible use of AI
generalstated in cells research gapevidence 5/5
Keywords: absence regulatory framework use artificial intelligence legal activities
Artificial Intelligence, Legal Automation, and the Normative Sphere: A Structuring-Theoretical Analysis (2026) · Liverpool Law Review · doi
The main difficulty raised by AI in law is not primarily technical but theoretical. - The location of legal normativity and the process through which legal norms are produced from legal texts in relation to social reality are not well understood.
generalstated in cells research gapevidence 5/5
Keywords: main difficulty raised law primarily technical theoretical location

Questions about this gap

the absence of regulatory framework for the use of artificial intelligence in legal activities; - the lack of doctrinal approaches for courts to respond to deficiencies in procedur… This is supported by 4 representative gap statements extracted from 4 papers, rated weak evidence.

Explore this gap further

Run this gap as a query across open scholarly engines for the latest related literature.

Find research gaps on this topic →Google Scholar ↗Semantic Scholar ↗OpenAlex ↗Europe PMC ↗CORE ↗

Working on this gap? Review it with us.

Science AI Journal reviews manuscripts in one pass with 8 specialised AI agents calibrated on 69,000+ real peer reviews.

Run an AI review Run a pre-submission check

Tools for your next paper

Pre-CheckIs your paper ready? A Tier 1–5 acceptance probability in seconds.Journal FinderA ranked shortlist of target journals from a 17,500-venue index.Duplicate Publication CheckerCheck prior-publication & salami-slicing risk across 8 sources.Citation GeneratorFreeA DOI or title → APA, MLA, Vancouver, Chicago, BibTeX, RIS. No signup.Graphical Abstract MakerFreeTurn your findings into a colorblind-safe graphical abstract.AI Review8 specialist agents return an editor-ready review of your full PDF.

Compare the category — Honest roundups of the AI research tools, ours listed alongside the alternatives.