chemistry7 papersavg year 1975moderate evidence

The complexity of the relationship between dominance

Research gap analysis derived from 7 chemistry papers in our local library.

The gap

The complexity of the relationship between dominance and reaction time. The need to control for other factors that may affect reaction time. The difficulty of designing tasks that require bilateral responses.

Evidence profile

Sourced from the stated research gap and future-work section and limitations section of the source papers, classified as general, drawn from work published between 1965 and 1983, spanning 4 journals.

Research trend

Established — well-defined area with open sub-problems.

Supporting evidence — 8 representative gaps

  • Impulsivity and speed and errors in a reaction time task: A contribution to the construct validity of the concept of impulsivity (1983) · Acta Psychologica · doi

    There is a need to investigate the relationship between impulsivity and reaction time in a two-choice reaction time task. Prior work has not fully explored the stability of the relationship between impulsivity and reaction time over time.

    generalstated research gap
    Keywords: there need investigate relationship between impulsivity reaction time
  • Autocorrelation of choice-reaction times (1979) · Acta Psychologica · doi

    Future research should investigate the autocorrelation of choice-reaction times in different tasks and populations. Future research should aim to develop a more comprehensive model of the CR decision process and its perturbation by interference from the activity of the sensory apparatus prior to the presentation of the reaction stimulus.

    generalfuture-work section
    Keywords: future research investigate autocorrelation choice-reaction times different tasks
  • The Deadline model for simple reaction times (1972) · Cognitive Psychology · doi

    The conventional interpretation of simple reaction time experiments assumes that subjects cannot readily depart from a preestablished plan. This assumption is challenged by the Deadline model. There is a need for more realistic approaches to dealing with anticipation responses.

    generalstated research gap
    Keywords: conventional interpretation simple reaction time experiments assumes subjects
  • The Locus of Reaction Time Change With Set, Motivation and Age (1965) · Journal of Gerontology · doi

    The study identifies a gap in the understanding of the locus of change in reaction time due to set, motivation, and age. The study notes that prior work has not fully assessed the effect of different stimulus intensities on the comparative old-young RT.

    generalstated research gap
    Keywords: study identifies gap understanding locus change reaction time
  • Age and Simple Reaction Time (1982) · Journal of Gerontology · doi

    Further research is needed to investigate the effects of age on reaction time in various contexts. The study highlights the need to consider the effects of age on reaction time in tasks that require rapid responses. Future research should examine the relationship between age and reaction time using different methods and stimuli.

    generalfuture-work section
    Keywords: further research needed investigate effects age reaction time
  • Interactions of expectancy and utility in a choice reaction time paradigm (1976) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi

    Prior work has not fully examined the interaction between expectancy and utility in choice reaction time paradigms. The current study addresses this gap by examining how the utility associated with a stimulus affects reaction time. The study provides evidence for the need for a two-process expectancy theory, which addresses a limitation of prior work.

    generalstated research gapevidence 5/5
    Keywords: prior work has fully examined interaction between expectancy
  • Interactions of expectancy and utility in a choice reaction time paradigm (1976) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi

    The study used a limited number of subjects and trials. The utility associated with each stimulus was manipulated in a specific way, which may not generalize to other contexts. The study did not examine the effects of other factors that may influence reaction time, such as attention or motivation.

    generallimitations sectionevidence 5/5
    Keywords: study used limited number subjects trials utility associated
  • Interactions of expectancy and utility in a choice reaction time paradigm (1976) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi

    Future studies should examine the effects of other factors that may influence reaction time, such as attention or motivation. The study suggests that the interaction between expectancy and utility should be considered in the design of tasks that require rapid responses to stimuli. Future research should aim to develop a more comprehensive theory of expectancy and utility in choice reaction time paradigms.

    generalfuture-work sectionevidence 4/5
    Keywords: future studies examine effects other factors influence reaction

Questions about this gap

The complexity of the relationship between dominance and reaction time. The need to control for other factors that may affect reaction time. The difficulty of designing tasks that… This is supported by 8 representative gap statements extracted from 7 papers, rated moderate evidence.

Explore this gap further

Run this gap as a query across open scholarly engines for the latest related literature.

Working on this gap? Review it with us.

Science AI Journal reviews manuscripts in one pass with 8 specialised AI agents calibrated on 69,000+ real peer reviews.

Related gaps in Chemistry

Command palette

Jump anywhere, run any action.